97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7816963)
21. Bayesian sample size for diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard: Comparing identifiable with non-identifiable models.
Dendukuri N; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2688-97. PubMed ID: 20803558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity and specificity of normality tests and consequences on reference interval accuracy at small sample size: a computer-simulation study.
Le Boedec K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):648-656. PubMed ID: 27556235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Post hoc choice of cut points introduced bias to diagnostic research.
Ewald B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):798-801. PubMed ID: 16828672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Small sample GEE estimation of regression parameters for longitudinal data.
Paul S; Zhang X
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3869-81. PubMed ID: 24797886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the interpretation of test sensitivity in the two-test two-population problem: assumptions matter.
Johnson WO; Gardner IA; Metoyer CN; Branscum AJ
Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):116-21. PubMed ID: 19651450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How independent are multiple 'independent' diagnostic classifications?
Brenner H
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1377-86. PubMed ID: 8841648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of three 3ABC ELISAs for foot-and-mouth disease non-structural antibodies using latent class analysis.
Bronsvoort BM; Toft N; Bergmann IE; Sørensen KJ; Anderson J; Malirat V; Tanya VN; Morgan KL
BMC Vet Res; 2006 Oct; 2():30. PubMed ID: 17042948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard using an Anaplasma marginale field data set].
Müllner P; Dreher UM; Meli ML; Lutz H; Hofman-Lehmann R; Doherr MG
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(9-10):416-22. PubMed ID: 16206931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. From diagnostic accuracy to accurate diagnosis: interpreting a test result with confidence.
Zou G
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 15155020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Verification bias an underrecognized source of error in assessing the efficacy of medical imaging.
Petscavage JM; Richardson ML; Carr RB
Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 21145764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2857-66. PubMed ID: 16134167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Exact confidence limits for prevalence of a disease with an imperfect diagnostic test.
Reiczigel J; Földi J; Ozsvári L
Epidemiol Infect; 2010 Nov; 138(11):1674-8. PubMed ID: 20196903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of screening tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis: bias associated with the patient-infected-status algorithm.
Hadgu A; Dendukuri N; Wang L
Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 22157304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.
Buderer NM
Acad Emerg Med; 1996 Sep; 3(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 8870764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Point and interval estimation of accuracies of a binary medical diagnostic test following group sequential testing.
Shu Y; Liu A; Li Z
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2335-45. PubMed ID: 18407894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
