174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7817678)
1. Nickel patch test reactivity and the menstrual cycle.
Rohold AE; Halkier-Sørensen L; Andersen KE; Thestrup-Pedersen K
Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Sep; 74(5):383-5. PubMed ID: 7817678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of nickel patch test reactivity in phases of the menstrual cycle.
Tamer E; Ikizoglu G; Toy GG; Alli N
Int J Dermatol; 2003 Jun; 42(6):455-8. PubMed ID: 12786872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nickel contact allergy and menstrual cycle.
Bonamonte D; Foti C; Antelmi AR; Biscozzi AM; Naro ED; Fanelli M; Loverro G; Angelini G
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):309-13. PubMed ID: 15932580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity.
Hindsén M; Bruze M; Christensen OB
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Jun; 10(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 10357713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-response testing with nickel sulphate using the TRUE test in nickel-sensitive individuals. Multiple nickel sulphate patch-test reactions do not cause an 'angry back'.
Andersen KE; Lidén C; Hansen J; Vølund A
Br J Dermatol; 1993 Jul; 129(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 8369211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive nickel patch tests in infants are of low clinical relevance and rarely reproducible.
Mortz CG; Kjaer HF; Eller E; Osterballe M; Norberg LA; Høst A; Bindslev-Jensen C; Andersen KE
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Feb; 24(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 23331531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of previous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hypersensitivity to nickel.
Hindsén M; Bruze M; Christensen OB
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 9330814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation and covariation in patch test reactivity to palladium and nickel salts.
Rosholm Comstedt L; Engfeldt M; Svedman C; Åkesson A; Hindsén M; Bruze M
Eur J Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 28(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 30530435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of previous contact dermatitis for elicitation of contact allergy to nickel.
Hindsén M; Bruze M
Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Sep; 78(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 9779257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patch testing with nickel sulfate: comparison between 2 nickel sulfate preparations and 2 different test sites on the back.
Simonetti V; Manzini BM; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Oct; 39(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 9817224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of the Finn chamber nickel patch test in two different phases of the ovulatory menstrual cycle.
Aktan S; Aktan E; Inanir I; Kaleli B; Sanli B
Dermatology; 1998; 197(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9812027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical expression of nickel contact dermatitis primed by diagnostic patch test.
Theler B; Bucher C; French LE; Ballmer Weber B; Hofbauer GF
Dermatology; 2009; 219(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 19349696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pretreatment of the test area with 1-day occlusion improves the response rate to NiSO4 5% pet. patch tests in subjects with a positive history of nickel allergy.
Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8565454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reactivity of the back revisited. Are there differences in reactivity in different parts of the back?
Björk AK; Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Nielsen C; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 27593358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergic contact dermatitis due to nickel: descriptive study in a tertiary hospital, 2000-2010.
García-Rabasco AE; Zaragozá-Ninet V; García-Ruíz R; de la Cuadra-Oyanguren J
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2014; 105(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 24530124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single doses of local betamethasone do not suppress allergic patch test reactions to nickel sulfate.
Molander G; Petman L; Kannas L; Lauerma AI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Apr; 50(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 15186376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nickel contact hypersensitivity in children.
Silverberg NB; Licht J; Friedler S; Sethi S; Laude TA
Pediatr Dermatol; 2002; 19(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11994170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of self-testing as a method to estimate the prevalence of nickel allergy.
Josefson A; Svensson A; Färm G; Engfeldt M; Meding B
Acta Derm Venereol; 2011 Sep; 91(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 21874219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
