118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7819640)
1. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation.
Dick JC; Jones MP; Zdeblick TA; Kunz DN; Horton WC
J Spinal Disord; 1994 Oct; 7(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 7819640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel technique for surgical repair of spondylolysis in adolescents.
Ulibarri JA; Anderson PA; Escarcega T; Mann D; Noonan KJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2067-72. PubMed ID: 16915090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Segmental pedicle screw fixation or cross-links in multilevel lumbar constructs. a biomechanical analysis.
Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Mohr RA; Nguyen BK
Spine J; 2001; 1(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 14588318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling.
Ferrara LA; Secor JL; Jin BH; Wakefield A; Inceoglu S; Benzel EC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1226-34. PubMed ID: 12811265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.
Chen SH; Mo Lin R; Chen HH; Tsai KJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Mar; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17349057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intradiscal pressure changes with dynamic pedicle screw systems.
Dath R; Sirkett DM; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 18525483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength?
Barber JW; Boden SD; Ganey T; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Jun; 11(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 9657546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation.
Early S; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 15959368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
