These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7819705)

  • 1. A plea for a more fastidious and objective use of statistics.
    Walters DE
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1994 Feb; 11(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 7819705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Sep; 13(17):1715-26. PubMed ID: 7997705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In search of equipoise.
    Chopra V; Davis M
    JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(12):1234-5. PubMed ID: 21427376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
    Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
    Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.
    Hannan EL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jun; 1(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19463302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistics notes: missing outcomes in randomised trials.
    Vickers AJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3438. PubMed ID: 23744649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interpretation and use of statistics in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Powers RD; Martin PM
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 27(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 10958001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public availability and adherence to prespecified statistical analysis approaches was low in published randomized trials.
    Kahan BC; Ahmad T; Forbes G; Cro S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Dec; 128():29-34. PubMed ID: 32730852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immortal time bias in drug safety cohort studies: spontaneous abortion following nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug exposure.
    Daniel S; Koren G; Lunenfeld E; Levy A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):307.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25265406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical management of data in clinical research.
    Fleiss JL; Kingman A
    Crit Rev Oral Biol Med; 1990; 1(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 2101261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part I: study design, sampling strategy, implementation, and analytic approaches.
    Clarke DE; Narrow WE; Regier DA; Kuramoto SJ; Kupfer DJ; Kuhl EA; Greiner L; Kraemer HC
    Am J Psychiatry; 2013 Jan; 170(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 23111546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical trial design for orthodontists.
    Pandis N; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 23794689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Describing the participants in a study.
    Pickering RM
    Age Ageing; 2017 Jul; 46(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28472376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
    Pinto A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The true meaning of DICE: don't ignore chance effects.
    Clarke M
    J R Soc Med; 2021 Dec; 114(12):575-577. PubMed ID: 34935558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Profiling assisted reproductive technology: the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry and the rising costs of assisted reproductive technology.
    Garcia JE
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Apr; 69(4):624-6. PubMed ID: 9548149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials with missing outcomes.
    Scharfstein DO; Daniels MJ; Robins JM
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):495-512. PubMed ID: 14557107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of sampling in clinical trial design.
    Krause M; Lutz W; Boehnke JR
    Psychother Res; 2011 May; 21(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 21347979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.