These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7819705)

  • 21. Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials.
    Wittes J
    Epidemiol Rev; 2002; 24(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 12119854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Primer: the fallacy of subgroup analysis.
    Guillemin F
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2007 Jul; 3(7):407-13. PubMed ID: 17599075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selection bias in observational and experimental studies.
    Ellenberg JH
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):557-67. PubMed ID: 8023035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uncertainty and sampling error.
    Altman DG; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g7064. PubMed ID: 25424395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vitamin A supplementation and childhood morbidity.
    West KP; Brown KH; Katz J; Rohde J
    Lancet; 1993 Dec; 342(8884):1420-1. PubMed ID: 7901698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guided by the research design: choosing the right statistical test.
    Beath A; Jones MP
    Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):163-165. PubMed ID: 29490219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performing baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials.
    Galal U; Fanshawe TR
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Oct; 25(5):183. PubMed ID: 31796579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Morris T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):810-1. PubMed ID: 22564502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. FSH replaced by low-dose hCG in the late follicular phase versus continued FSH for assisted reproductive techniques.
    Martins WP; Vieira AD; Figueiredo JB; Nastri CO
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD010042. PubMed ID: 23543584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased view.
    Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 19342465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical methods for estimating the probability of spontaneous abortion in observational studies--analyzing pregnancies exposed to coumarin derivatives.
    Meister R; Schaefer C
    Reprod Toxicol; 2008 Sep; 26(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18620043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The architecture of clinical research (From the "Biostatistics and Epidemiology Lecture Series, Part 1").
    Stoller JK
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2017 Sep; 84(9 Suppl 2):e2-e9. PubMed ID: 28937357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. RCTs and cessation frustration.
    Wickham S
    Pract Midwife; 2006 Feb; 9(2):35. PubMed ID: 16512034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spontaneous and induced abortion. Report of a WHO scientific group.
    World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; 1970; 461():3-51. PubMed ID: 4993606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sample size calculations in randomized trials: common pitfalls.
    Brasher PM; Brant RF
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 54(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 17272248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are spontaneous abortion rates useful in monitoring reproductive hazards?
    James WH
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2333-5. PubMed ID: 8943554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Potkin SG; Siu CO
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.