These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7820918)

  • 1. Use of confocal microscopy to determine matrix and surface protein deposition profiles in hydrogel contact lenses.
    Meadows DL; Paugh JR
    CLAO J; 1994 Oct; 20(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 7820918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics.
    Sack RA; Sathe S; Hackworth LA; Willcox MD; Holden BA; Morris CA
    Curr Eye Res; 1996 Nov; 15(11):1092-100. PubMed ID: 8950503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses.
    Garrett Q; Garrett RW; Milthorpe BK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 40(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 10102286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selectivity and localization of lysozyme uptake in contemporary hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Heynen M; Babaei Omali N; Fadli Z; Coles-Brennan C; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2017 Sep; 28(13):1351-1364. PubMed ID: 28539099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Vitro Spoilation of Silicone-Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses in a Model-Blink Cell.
    Peng CC; Fajardo NP; Razunguzwa T; Radke CJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):768-80. PubMed ID: 26083462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depth Profile Assessment of the Early Phase Deposition of Lysozyme on Soft Contact Lens Materials Using a Novel In Vitro Eye Model.
    Qiao H; Phan CM; Walther H; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S11-S18. PubMed ID: 28617725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy.
    Luensmann D; Zhang F; Subbaraman L; Sheardown H; Jones L
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Aug; 34(8):683-97. PubMed ID: 19899996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits.
    Myers RI; Larsen DW; Tsao M; Castellano C; Becherer LD; Fontana F; Ghormley NR; Meier G
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Oct; 68(10):776-82. PubMed ID: 1749595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localization of full-length recombinant human proteoglycan-4 in commercial contact lenses using confocal microscopy.
    Cheung S; Subbaraman LN; Ngo W; Jay GD; Schmidt TA; Jones L
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2020 Jan; 31(1):110-122. PubMed ID: 31594478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface interactions on hydrogel extended wear contact lenses: microflora and microfauna.
    Hart DE; Shih KL
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Oct; 64(10):739-48. PubMed ID: 3479905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials.
    Young G; Bowers R; Hall B; Port M
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 9348449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deposition of lipid, protein, and secretory phospholipase A2 on hydrophilic contact lenses.
    Mochizuki H; Yamada M; Hatou S; Kawashima M; Hata S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18180684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison by contact lens cytology and clinical tests of three contact lens types.
    Wilson G; Schwallie JD; Bauman RE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 May; 75(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 9624696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of silicone hydrogel contact lenses' surface reflection characteristics using confocal microscopy.
    Suliński T; Nowak N; Szymański J; Pniewski J
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2023 Dec; 34(17):2400-2410. PubMed ID: 37584778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition.
    Zhao Z; Carnt NA; Aliwarga Y; Wei X; Naduvilath T; Garrett Q; Korth J; Willcox MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 19165125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses.
    Luensmann D; Glasier MA; Zhang F; Bantseev V; Simpson T; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):839-47. PubMed ID: 17873769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Daily Wear Contact Lenses Manufactured in Etafilcon A Are Noninferior to Two Silicone Hydrogel Lens Types With Respect to Hypoxic Stress.
    Szczotka-Flynn LB; Debanne S; Benetz BA; Wilson T; Brennan N
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 27768615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-laser dual-immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy using Cy2- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies: unequivocal detection of co-localization of neuronal markers.
    Wouterlood FG; Van Denderen JC; Blijleven N; Van Minnen J; Härtig W
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 1998 Jan; 2(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 9473644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determinants of the initial comfort of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Efron N; Brennan NA; Currie JM; Fitzgerald JP; Hughes MT
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Oct; 63(10):819-23. PubMed ID: 3535525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phospholipids and their degrading enzyme in the tears of soft contact lens wearers.
    Yamada M; Mochizuki H; Kawashima M; Hata S
    Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10 Suppl 1):S68-72. PubMed ID: 17001197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.