These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7821129)

  • 1. The effect of recurrent practice at home on the acceptability of capillary blood glucose readings. Accuracy of self blood glucose testing.
    Kabadi UM; O'Connell KM; Johnson J; Kabadi M
    Diabetes Care; 1994 Oct; 17(10):1110-23. PubMed ID: 7821129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptability of capillary blood glucose testing with Companion 2 after intensive individual patient training.
    Kabadi UM; Kabadi M; O'Connell KM
    Diabetes Res; 1994; 26(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 7664534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System.
    Bailey T; Bode BW; Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Alva S
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Nov; 17(11):787-94. PubMed ID: 26171659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation on the accuracy of the blood glucose monitoring device Prestige IQ.
    Larbig M; Forst T; Mondok A; Forst S; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2003 Aug; 16(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 14768776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of fingerstick blood glucose measurements with GlucoWatch biographer glucose results in young subjects with type 1 diabetes.
    Garg SK; Potts RO; Ackerman NR; Fermi SJ; Tamada JA; Chase HP
    Diabetes Care; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1708-14. PubMed ID: 10526740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of the CONTOUR® TS Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
    Frank J; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Parkes JL
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 21303645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
    Kempe KC; Budd D; Stern M; Ellison JM; Saari LA; Adiletto CA; Olin B; Price DA; Horwitz DL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(6):916-26. PubMed ID: 16386098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicenter study of the accuracy of the One Touch Ultra home glucose meter in children with type 1 diabetes.
    Diabetes Research In Children Network (Direcnet) Study Group
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):933-41. PubMed ID: 14709195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations.
    Macleod K; Katz LB; Cameron H
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):546-552. PubMed ID: 30084263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisite evaluation of a new diabetes self-test for glucose and glycated protein (fructosamine).
    Edelman SV; Callahan P; Deeb LC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2000; 2(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 11469264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites.
    Ellison JM; Stegmann JM; Colner SL; Michael RH; Sharma MK; Ervin KR; Horwitz DL
    Diabetes Care; 2002 Jun; 25(6):961-4. PubMed ID: 12032099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and utility of a 10-test disk blood glucose meter.
    Kendall DM; Kaplan RA; Paulson CF; Parkes JL; Tideman AM
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Jan; 67(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15620431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of the DIDGET blood glucose monitoring system in children, teens, and young adults.
    Deeb LC; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Schachner HC; Viggiani MT; Wallace J; Bailey T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 22027310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users.
    Bailey TS; Wallace JF; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Yu J; Schachner HC; Simmons DA; Chu A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Sep; 14(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 22746838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and technical evaluation of a new self-monitoring blood glucose meter: assessment of analytical and user error.
    Lehmann R; Kayrooz S; Greuter H; Spinas GA
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2001 Aug; 53(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 11403861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Mastrototaro J; Shin J; Marcus A; Sulur G;
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Oct; 10(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 18715215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy.
    Bergenstal R; Pearson J; Cembrowski GS; Bina D; Davidson J; List S
    Diabetes Educ; 2000; 26(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 11912810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical performance and ease of use of a blood glucose meter that uses a 10-test disk.
    Garg SK; Carter JA; Mullen L; Folker AC; Parkes JL; Tideman AM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2004 Aug; 6(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 15321005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of One Touch HORIZON--a highly affordable glucose monitor.
    Mohan V; Deepa R; Shefali AK; Poongothai S; Monica M; Karkuzhali K
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2004 Oct; 52():779-82. PubMed ID: 15909854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capillary and venous blood glucose measurements using a direct glucose-sensing meter.
    Matthews DR; Burton SF; Bown E; Chusney G; Dornan T; Gale EA; McKinnon G; Steemson J
    Diabet Med; 1991 Nov; 8(9):875-80. PubMed ID: 1837516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.