BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7821461)

  • 1. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new chart to improve the efficiency of glaucoma detection by oculokinetic perimetry.
    Stirling RJ; MacLeod JD; Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 1)():121-4. PubMed ID: 8013705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with a blue stimulus on a dark background.
    Wessels IF; Randhawa RS
    Eye (Lond); 1996; 10 ( Pt 5)():620-5. PubMed ID: 8977793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry.
    Chia WL; Goldberg I; Bauman A
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10571390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hand-held OKP chart for the screening of glaucoma: preliminary evaluation.
    Damato BE; Chyla J; McClure E; Jay JL; Allan D
    Eye (Lond); 1990; 4 ( Pt 4)():632-7. PubMed ID: 2226995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Application of oculokinetic perimetry in examination of the eye].
    Wakakura M; Kageyama M; Hamanaka T; Shimizu K; Joshita H; Shimizu T; Baba H; Kisara M; Miyata M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jul; 100(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 8741340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glaucoma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: is its specificity acceptable?
    Christoffersen T; Fors T; Waage S; Holtedahl K
    Eye (Lond); 1995; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():36-9. PubMed ID: 8729017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.
    Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Javitt J; Witt K; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 34(12):3271-7. PubMed ID: 8225862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser.
    Greve M; Chisholm IA
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 28(5):201-6. PubMed ID: 8221366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the current oculokinetic perimetry chart be improved?
    Chia WL; Goldberg I
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 10571391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.