BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7822365)

  • 1. Reciprocating orthoses for children with myelomeningocele. A comparison of two types.
    Phillips DL; Field RE; Broughton NS; Menelaus MB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Jan; 77(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 7822365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal assessment of oxygen cost and velocity in children with myelomeningocele: comparison of the hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis and the reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Thomas SS; Buckon CE; Melchionni J; Magnusson M; Aiona MD
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 11675558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reciprocating gait orthosis in myelomeningocele.
    Yngve DA; Douglas R; Roberts JM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1984 May; 4(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 6736234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of hip guidance with reciprocating gait orthoses in children with spinal paraplegia: results of a ten-year prospective study.
    Robb JE; Gordon L; Ferguson D; Dunhill Z; Elton RA; Minns RA
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Dec; 9 Suppl 1():15-8. PubMed ID: 10661784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy consumption in children with myelomeningocele: a comparison between reciprocating gait orthosis and hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis ambulators.
    Cuddeford TJ; Freeling RP; Thomas SS; Aiona MD; Rex D; Sirolli H; Elliott J; Magnusson M
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1997 Apr; 39(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 9183262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of conventional hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses versus reciprocating-gait orthoses for children with high-level paraparesis.
    Katz DE; Haideri N; Song K; Wyrick P
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1997; 17(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 9150029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambulation with the reciprocating-gait orthosis. Experience in 15 children with myelomeningocele or paraplegia.
    Gerritsma-Bleeker CL; Heeg M; Vos-Niël H
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Oct; 68(5):470-3. PubMed ID: 9385249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parawalker: energy cost of walking.
    Banta JV; Bell KJ; Muik EA; Fezio J
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1991 Dec; 1 Suppl 1():7-10. PubMed ID: 1807396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of the Orthotic Research and Locomotor Assessment Unit (ORLAU) ParaWalker by adult myelomeningocele patients: a seven year retrospective study--preliminary results.
    Stallard J; Major RE; Patrick JH
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1995 Dec; 5 Suppl 1():24-6. PubMed ID: 8770574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Current status of orthotic management of children with meningomyelocele].
    Doll B; Michael T
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1994; 132(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Orthotic Gait Training with Isocentric Reciprocating Gait Orthosis on Walking in Children with Myelomeningocele.
    Arazpour M; Soleimani F; Sajedi F; Vameghi R; Bani MA; Gharib M; Samadian M
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2017; 23(2):147-154. PubMed ID: 29339891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary kinematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
    Yakimovich T; Lemaire ED; Kofman J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 16949186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of dynamic orthoses on gait: a retrospective control study in children with hemiplegia.
    Van Gestel L; Molenaers G; Huenaerts C; Seyler J; Desloovere K
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Jan; 50(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18173633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthotic compensation for non-functioning hip extensors.
    Ogilvie C; Messenger N; Bowker P; Rowley DI
    Z Kinderchir; 1988 Dec; 43 Suppl 2():33-5. PubMed ID: 3213248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of orthotic treatment in children with myelomeningocele.
    Schiltenwolf M; Carstens C; Rohwedder J; Gründel E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1991 Dec; 1 Suppl 1():50-2. PubMed ID: 1807395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Physiological Cost Index of walking with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis among patients with T(12) - L(1) spinal cord injury.
    Leung AK; Wong AF; Wong EC; Hutchins SW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Mar; 33(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19235067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinetics of compensatory gait in persons with myelomeningocele.
    Gutierrez EM; Bartonek A; Haglund-Akerlind Y; Saraste H
    Gait Posture; 2005 Jan; 21(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 15536030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of AFO use with myelomeningocele children.
    Thomas SE; Mazur JM; Child ME; Supan TJ
    Z Kinderchir; 1989 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():38-40. PubMed ID: 2623961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Anti-calcaneus carbon fiber orthosis in children with myelomeningocele].
    Bérard C; Delmas MC; Locqueneux F; Vadot JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1990; 76(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 2146718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gait analysis in low lumbar myelomeningocele patients with unilateral hip dislocation or subluxation.
    Gabrieli AP; Vankoski SJ; Dias LS; Milani C; Lourenco A; Filho JL; Novak R
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2003; 23(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 12724595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.