These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7823365)

  • 1. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis.
    Pan XM; Saloner D; Reilly LM; Bowersox JC; Murray SP; Anderson CM; Gooding GA; Rapp JH
    J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jan; 21(1):82-8; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 7823365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
    Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
    Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
    Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
    J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
    Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
    Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complete MR angiography and Doppler ultrasound as the sole imaging modalities prior to carotid endarterectomy.
    Saouaf R; Grassi CJ; Hartnell GG; Wheeler H; Suojanen JN
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Aug; 53(8):579-86. PubMed ID: 9744583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
    Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
    Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
    Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
    Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Carotid Doppler Ultrasound to Other Angiographic Modalities in the Measurement of Carotid Artery Stenosis.
    Boyko M; Kalashyan H; Becher H; Romanchuk H; Saqqur M; Rempel JL; Derksen C; Shuaib A; Khan K
    J Neuroimaging; 2018 Nov; 28(6):683-687. PubMed ID: 29917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Elgersma OE; Buskens E; Hunink MG; Kappelle LJ; Buijs PC; Wüst AF; van der Lugt A; van der Graaf Y
    Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):2003-8. PubMed ID: 12154253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis.
    Morasch MD; Gurjala AN; Washington E; Chiou AC; Simonetti OP; Finn JP; Yao JS
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 11957000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography.
    Jackson MR; Chang AS; Robles HA; Gillespie DL; Olsen SB; Kaiser WJ; Goff JM; O'Donnell SD; Rich NM
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modalities of preoperative imaging of the internal carotid artery used in France.
    Long A; Lepoutre A; Corbillon E; Branchereau A; Kretz JG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 12016537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
    Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging to evaluate carotid artery stenosis: comparison with magnetic resonance angiography.
    Igase K; Kumon Y; Matsubara I; Arai M; Goishi J; Watanabe H; Ohnishi T; Sadamoto K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 25440325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carotid Doppler ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery stenosis based on residual lumen diameter calculated from en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimens.
    Suwanwela N; Can U; Furie KL; Southern JF; Macdonald NR; Ogilvy CS; Hansen CJ; Buonanno FS; Abbott WM; Koroshetz WJ; Kistler JP
    Stroke; 1996 Nov; 27(11):1965-9. PubMed ID: 8898799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.