75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7823522)
1. [Physical and aerodynamic airflow relations of the air stream of the Micro-Air aesthesiometer].
Kohlhaas M; Draeger J; Schmitz N; Böhm A; Bosse I; Hechler B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Oct; 205(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 7823522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Measuring corneal sensitivity with the air aesthesiometer in comparison with the Draeger electromagnetic air aesthesiometer].
Kohlhaas M; Böhm A; Schmitz N; Draeger J
Ophthalmologe; 1994 Oct; 91(5):685-90. PubMed ID: 7812106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the sensory function of the ocular surface: implications of use of a non-contact air jet aesthesiometer versus the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
Golebiowski B; Papas E; Stapleton F
Exp Eye Res; 2011 May; 92(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 21376718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA).
Murphy PJ; Patel S; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 8762770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Development of corneal sensitivity after phacoemulsification with scleral tunnel incision].
Kohlhaas M; Stahlhut O; Tholuck J; Richard G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jul; 211(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 9340403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Corneal reinnervation after lamellar keratoplasty in comparison with epikeratophakia and photorefractive keratectomy].
Böhm A; Kohlhaas M; Kliefoth U; Draeger J; Lombardi M; Abbondanza M; Zuppardo M; Görne M
Ophthalmologe; 1994 Oct; 91(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 7812096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of the non-contact corneal aesthesiometer and its comparison with the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
Murphy PJ; Lawrenson JG; Patel S; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Nov; 18(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 10070549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the stimulus of an air-jet aesthesiometer: computerised modelling and subjective interpretation.
Golebiowski B; Lim M; Papas E; Stapleton F
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 23406490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparison of corneal sensitivity between healthy cats and cats with corneal sequestra].
Wagner F; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Heider HJ; Görig C; Nolte I
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003; 116(9-10):427-31. PubMed ID: 14526473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decreased corneal sensitivity in patients with dry eye.
Bourcier T; Acosta MC; Borderie V; Borrás F; Gallar J; Bury T; Laroche L; Belmonte C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2341-5. PubMed ID: 15980220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eccentric variation of corneal sensitivity to pneumatic stimulation at different temperatures and with CO2.
Situ P; Simpson TL; Fonn D
Exp Eye Res; 2007 Sep; 85(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 17662716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of corneal sensitivity to mechanical and chemical stimuli after LASIK: a pilot study.
Stapleton F; Hayward KB; Bachand N; Trong PH; Teh DW; Deng KM; Yang EI; Kelly SL; Lette M; Robinson D
Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Mar; 32(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 16538130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term anterior and posterior topographic analysis of the cornea after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty.
Lombardo M; Lombardo G; Friend DJ; Serrao S; Terry MA
Cornea; 2009 May; 28(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 19411959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recovery of corneal sensitivity following keratoplasty and corneal diseases].
Gong XM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1992 May; 28(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 1286601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Rosenberg ME; Tervo TM; Immonen IJ; Müller LJ; Grönhagen-Riska C; Vesaluoma MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2915-21. PubMed ID: 10967045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulus characteristics of a novel air-based multiple stimulus aesthesiometer.
Mungalsingh MA; Thompson B; Peterson SD; Murphy PJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 37994563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does air gas aesthesiometry generate a true mechanical stimulus for corneal sensitivity measurement?
Nosch DS; Pult H; Albon J; Purslow C; Murphy PJ
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 28922696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Corneal reinnervation after keratomileusis in situ and keratomileusis myopica--a comparison].
Kohlhaas M; Draeger J; Lerche RC; Klemm M; Barraquer C; Barraquer JI; Flicker D; Rivera F; Carriazo C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Feb; 206(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 7739188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of corneal sensitivity to mechanical and chemical stimulation with a CO2 esthesiometer.
Belmonte C; Acosta MC; Schmelz M; Gallar J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Feb; 40(2):513-9. PubMed ID: 9950612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
