246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7824250)
1. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk.
Taylor CA; Weinstein L; Mayhew HE
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 7824250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating residency applicants: stable values in a changing market.
Travis C; Taylor CA; Mayhew HE
Fam Med; 1999 Apr; 31(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 10212766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
Bernstein AD; Jazrawi LM; Elbeshbeshy B; Della Valle CJ; Zuckerman JD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2002-2003; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One residency's experience with the electronic residency application service.
Mandel LP; Spadoni LR; Hewitson LA; Vontver LA
Fam Med; 1997 Mar; 29(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 9085105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Residency training in colposcopy: a survey of program directors in obstetrics and gynecology and family practice.
Spitzer M; Apgar BS; Brotzman GL; Krumholz BA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 11518918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. United states medical licensing examination scores as a predictor of performance on the annual council of resident education in obstetrics and gynecology examinations.
Spellacy WN; Downes KL
J Reprod Med; 2014; 59(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 24597281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 5-year residency curriculum in obstetrics, gynecology, and family medicine.
Mann WJ; Bruder K; Frazier C; Evans P
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 94(2):317-20. PubMed ID: 10432150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing pediatric dental program directors' selection of residents and demographics of current directors.
Majewski RF; da Fonseca MA; Devries ES; Hu JC; Murdoch-Kinch CA
J Dent Educ; 2009 Mar; 73(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 19289723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey.
Green M; Jones P; Thomas JX
Acad Med; 2009 Mar; 84(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 19240447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal ultrasound training for obstetrics and gynecology residents.
Lee W; Hodges AN; Williams S; Vettraino IM; McNie B
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 14754704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
Go PH; Klaassen Z; Chamberlain RS
Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 22515757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of residency match information disseminated by a third-party website.
Kutikov A; Morgan TM; Resnick MJ
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 19896626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electronic residency application service scores: do they correlate with the rank order list for the match?
Argeles PC; Weiss PM; Koller CA; Kimmel S; Hess LW
J Reprod Med; 2006 Jun; 51(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 16846085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to predict USMLE scores from COMLEX-USA scores: a guide for directors of ACGME-accredited residency programs.
Slocum PC; Louder JS
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Sep; 106(9):568-9. PubMed ID: 17079527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training.
Provan JL; Cuttress L
CMAJ; 1995 Oct; 153(7):919-23. PubMed ID: 7553493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Common accreditation and educational problems in obstetrics-gynecology residencies.
Gideon MD; Gienapp JC; O'Connor P
J Reprod Med; 1983 Jun; 28(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 6887146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Residency directors' responses to the concept of a proposed electronic residency application service.
Taylor CA; Mayhew HE; Weinstein L
Acad Med; 1994 Feb; 69(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 8311885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
