These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7824312)

  • 41. Surveillance of susceptibility patterns in 1297 European and US anaerobic and capnophilic isolates to co-amoxiclav and five other antimicrobial agents.
    Koeth LM; Good CE; Appelbaum PC; Goldstein EJ; Rodloff AC; Claros M; Dubreuil LJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Jun; 53(6):1039-44. PubMed ID: 15128729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro susceptibility testing of nonsporing anaerobes to ten antimicrobial agents.
    Rao PS; Shivananda PG
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 43(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11218673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bacteriologic features and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolates from orofacial odontogenic infections.
    Kuriyama T; Karasawa T; Nakagawa K; Saiki Y; Yamamoto E; Nakamura S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Nov; 90(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 11077383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of an automated system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Arzese A; Minisini R; Botta GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Feb; 13(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8013485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Inducible metronidazole resistance in nim-positive and nim-negative bacteroides fragilis group strains after several passages metronidazole containing columbia agar plates.
    Schaumann R; Petzold S; Fille M; Rodloff AC
    Infection; 2005 Oct; 33(5-6):368-72. PubMed ID: 16258869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Comparative study of various API galeries for the identification of gram negative bacteria].
    Reynaud AE; Coude Du Foresto B; Courtieu AL
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1988; 46(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 3291654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A survey of the identification and susceptibility testing of anaerobes in diagnostic microbiology laboratories in Scotland, UK.
    Smith AJ; Lockhart DE; Tyers A; Poxton IR
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Apr; 65(4):805. PubMed ID: 20142266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Sensitivity of anaerobic bacteria to antibiotics: experience at Hôpital Saint-Luc].
    Lamothe F; Bourgault AM; Turgeon P; Vincelette J; Gaudreau C; Turgeon F
    Union Med Can; 1984 Jun; 113(6):485-8. PubMed ID: 6385431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice].
    Renaud F; Freney J; Gavini F; Boeufgras JM; Fleurette J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2188531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Detection of anaerobes by direct immunofluorescence on clinical samples : evaluation of fluoretec F and M (author's transl)].
    Drugeon HB; Chung SS; Courtieu AL
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1981; 39(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 6118083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Comparative study of the disk technic and of the tube dilution technic for determining the susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics].
    Rodríguez MA
    Medicina (Mex); 1965 Jun; 45(965):247-53. PubMed ID: 5320927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Antibiograms in hospital routine, with special reference to the process of hemoglobin reduction].
    Solé-Vernin C
    Hospital (Rio J); 1970 May; 77(5):1673-88. PubMed ID: 4989587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rapid characterization of oral and nonoral pigmented Bacteroides species with the ATB Anaerobes ID system.
    van Winkelhoff AJ; Clement M; de Graaff J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 May; 26(5):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3290235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quantitative evaluation of the joint effects in vitro of two antibiotics associated according to a factorial design.
    Gori E; Sangiovanni MP; Floris E; Pagan M
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda); 1965; 5():273-7. PubMed ID: 5327511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Comparative study of the diastatic systems of strict and optional anaerobes].
    AUBEL E; ROSENBERG AJ; SZULMAJSTER J
    Bull Soc Chim Biol (Paris); 1947; 29(1-3):192-5. PubMed ID: 20262706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: evaluation of the redesigned (Version 96) bioMérieux ATB ANA device.
    Dubreuil L; Houcke I; Singer E
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1824-8. PubMed ID: 10325331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Comparison of two routine techniques for the evaluation of the susceptibility to antibiotics of strict anaerobic bacteria: E test AB Biodisk and ATB ANA Biomerieux].
    Houcke I; Pagniez C; Segard-Roussel V; Dubreuil L
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1994 May; 42(5):454-9. PubMed ID: 7824312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by E-test, ATB-ANA and agar dilution.
    Koru O; Ozyurt M
    Anaerobe; 2008 Jun; 14(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 18424192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of the E-test for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
    Piérard D; De Meyer A; Rosseel P; Lauwers S
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1996 May; 44(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 8758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.