These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7824928)

  • 1. Biotech regulations. Germany loosens some red tape.
    Koenig RL
    Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5196):326. PubMed ID: 7824928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Britain opens biotech regulation to greater public involvement.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):287-8. PubMed ID: 10360555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who's afraid of biotechnology?
    Tait J
    New Sci; 1992 Jun; 134(1827):49. PubMed ID: 16044585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Russia readies its first gene law.
    Allakhverdov A
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1558. PubMed ID: 7777849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biologists mobilize against anti-genetics referendum.
    Koenig R
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5300):607-8. PubMed ID: 9019813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revamp biotech rules, says White House.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):894. PubMed ID: 26348945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Cambridge model: how public oversight of biotech is good for everyone--even business.
    Lipson S
    Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 15025120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotech battlelines.
    Käppeli O; Auberson L
    Nature; 1998 Jul; 394(6688):10. PubMed ID: 9665118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic engineering. New advisory board approved.
    McGourty C
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):681. PubMed ID: 2797199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. G-8 leaders fudge biotech position.
    Dorey E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):923-4. PubMed ID: 10973204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
    Watanabe KN
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Britain regulates organism release.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):681. PubMed ID: 2797198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Europe/Japan face up to legal hurdles to cloning.
    Michael A
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):609-10. PubMed ID: 9219253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genes out of the bottle.
    New Repub; 2000 Feb; 222(9):9. PubMed ID: 14582498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recipe for disaster.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):465. PubMed ID: 12721554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Swiss biotech. Government shoots down GM plant trials.
    Weiss G
    Science; 2001 Dec; 294(5549):2067-9. PubMed ID: 11739923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.