264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7824978)
1. Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.
Pruijs JE; Hageman MA; Keessen W; van der Meer R; van Wieringen JC
Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Oct; 23(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 7824978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.
Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.
Morrissy RT; Goldsmith GS; Hall EC; Kehl D; Cowie GH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Mar; 72(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 2312527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.
Carman DL; Browne RH; Birch JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Mar; 72(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 2312528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Beauchamp M; Labelle H; Grimard G; Stanciu C; Poitras B; Dansereau J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(12):1581-3. PubMed ID: 8235834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Allam Y; El-Fiky T; Farghally MY; Al-Sabagh S; Siam AE
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 26223745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of a novel Cobb protractor for measuring the Cobb angle of radiograph in scoliosis.
Wu G; Wang H; Ding R; Xue XH; Wu ZH; Qiu GX
Chin Med Sci J; 2015 Mar; 30(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 25837355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.
Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of rib vertebral angle difference. Intraobserver error and interobserver variation.
McAlindon RJ; Kruse RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jan; 22(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 9122801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature.
He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Polyzois BD; Samelis P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():38-43. PubMed ID: 15456003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
