BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7825250)

  • 1. [Mammographic examinations in Denmark, 1990-1991].
    Andreasen AH; Andersen KW; Madsen M; Mouridsen HT; Olesen KP; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Oct; 156(44):6517-20. PubMed ID: 7825250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen. Results of the first screening round].
    Jørgensen T; Jensen LB; Duun S; Hirsch FR; Mouridsen HT; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Christensen LH; Hansen AG; Nissen FH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(9):1212-7. PubMed ID: 8644425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Acceptance of mammographic screening by immigrant women].
    Holk IK; Rosdahl N; Pedersen KL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 11831089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Csaba D; Budai A; Ember I
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Sep; 146(38):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16238249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Kövi R; Ember I
    Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(32):1491-8. PubMed ID: 18672438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991-99.
    Vejborg I; Olsen AH; Jensen MB; Rank F; Tange UB; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12370322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen 1991-1997. Evaluation of the preoperative assessment].
    Christensen LB; Rank FE; Blichert-Toft M; Christiansen T; Jørgensen T; Dunn S; Jensen LB; Vejborg IM; Tange UB; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 11831088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Referrals to clinical mammography in a county without screening program].
    Birk HO; Henriksen LO; Lindewald H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Jan; 163(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 11379240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of clinical mammography: a nationwide study from Denmark.
    Jensen A; Vejborg I; Severinsen N; Nielsen S; Rank F; Mikkelsen GJ; Hilden J; Vistisen D; Dyreborg U; Lynge E
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 119(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 16450388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overdiagnosis in screening mammography in Denmark: population based cohort study.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f1064. PubMed ID: 23444414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
    Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancer detection and mammogram volume of radiologists in a population-based screening programme.
    Rickard M; Taylor R; Page A; Estoesta J
    Breast; 2006 Feb; 15(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 16005226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammographic screening in the county of Copenhagen. Clinical consequences of the first three screening rounds].
    Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1036-40. PubMed ID: 11894704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening.
    Jacobsen KK; von Euler-Chelpin M
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Jun; 34(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 22233570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?
    Jensen A; Olsen AH; von Euler-Chelpin M; Helle Njor S; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    Int J Cancer; 2005 Jan; 113(3):464-70. PubMed ID: 15455383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen].
    Dige U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(16):2177-8. PubMed ID: 11989065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.