214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7825354)
21. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.
Strong C
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Confronting the "near irrelevance" of advance directives.
Dresser R
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 8003727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Advance directives in Luxembourg: legal aspects].
Thoma P
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2008; (3):353-69. PubMed ID: 19069735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Virginia's advance medical directive.
Kramer SL
Va Med Q; 1992; 119(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 1643122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Termination of life support measures in case of persons in permanent vegetative state.
Simon J; Ravenstein C
Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):219-26. PubMed ID: 15505921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The PSDA and geriatric psychiatry: a cautionary tale.
Marta J
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):80-1. PubMed ID: 8490230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Medical ethical aspects of the ambivalence to medical progress].
Fritsche P
Urologe A; 1994 Nov; 33(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 7817451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Euthanasia by request--from the medical viewpoint].
Helmchen H
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 8442364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A forced choice: the value of requiring advance directives.
Abbo ED; Volandes AE
J Clin Ethics; 2008; 19(2):127-40. PubMed ID: 18767473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient perceptions on the use of advance directives and life prolonging technology.
Clements JM
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2009; 26(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 19229067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The benefits of a North Carolina policy for determining inappropriate or futile medical care.
Kopelman AE; Parker JC; Ho G; Willson CF; Kopelman LM
N C Med J; 2005; 66(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 16323592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Guideline on the scope and limits of medical treatment responsibility in surgery. German Society of Surgery].
Pichlmayr R
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1996; 113():682-93. PubMed ID: 9101969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
Harvey JC
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Treatment limits at the end of life: what is legally protected, what is ethically acceptable?].
Stiefelhagen P
MMW Fortschr Med; 2011 Nov; 153(47):18. PubMed ID: 22165340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physicians autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Nov; (189):9-34. PubMed ID: 10144585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Brief definitions of medical ethics concepts. 22. Advance directives].
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1992; (6-7):XLVIII. PubMed ID: 1514297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Another ethics consultant looks at Mr. B's case: commentary on "An ethical dilemma.
Perkins HS
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 11642827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Advance planning for end-of life care.
Cummings CM
Adv Nurse Pract; 1998 Jul; 6(7):24. PubMed ID: 9782793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Advanced directives. Legal and practical aspects of negative instructions concerning medical treatment].
Griffiths J
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2002 Nov; 33(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 12481535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The proposed 'Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act'.
Pickhaver A
Contemp Nurse; 1993 Aug; 2(2):55. PubMed ID: 8260768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
