These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7825431)

  • 1. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system of deaf patients.
    Counter SA; Borg E; Bredberg G; Linde G; Vainio M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 7825431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound perception induced by extracranial magnetic stimulation in deaf patients.
    Counter SA; Borg E
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 1488610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Gundersen T; Ramírez-García E; Randa J
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 6719013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J; Schön F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH; Zwicker E; Scherer H; Seifert J; Leysieffer H; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perfusion SPECT in cochlear implantation and promontory stimulation.
    Allen A; Barnes A; Singh RS; Patterson J; Hadley DM; Wyper D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 May; 25(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 15100513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. The use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes.
    Spies TH; Snik AF; Mens LH; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Sep; 113(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8266782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.
    Alfelasi M; Piron JP; Mathiolon C; Lenel N; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 May; 270(6):1809-15. PubMed ID: 23053370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Preliminary studies of deaf patients assessed for cochlear implantation].
    Schorn K; Seifert J; Stecker M; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 3012229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive extratympanic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Liard P; Pelizzone M; Rohr A; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1988; 50(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 3405596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf.
    Gordon KA; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Brain; 2013 May; 136(Pt 5):1609-25. PubMed ID: 23576127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.