These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7827558)

  • 1. A fundamental problem of consent.
    Mitchell J
    BMJ; 1995 Jan; 310(6971):43-6; discussion 46-8. PubMed ID: 7827558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fundamental problem of consent. Nothing is inherently remiss in present methods of obtaining consent.
    Lyons SM; Saunders DS
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6984):935. PubMed ID: 7719192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The strange case of the misplaced suppository.
    Richmond C
    CMAJ; 1995 Oct; 153(7):980-1. PubMed ID: 7553501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GMC finds doctors not guilty in consent case.
    Court C
    BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7015):1245-6. PubMed ID: 7496222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fundamental problem of consent. Dentist is aggrieved at outcome.
    Laljee MM
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6984):935. PubMed ID: 7719191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How the GMC hears a case of alleged misconduct.
    Raphael T
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000; (160):17-8. PubMed ID: 11765752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consultant suspended for not getting consent for cardiac procedure.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1998 Mar; 316(7136):955. PubMed ID: 9550949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consent, sectionalisation and the concept of a medical procedure.
    Maclean AR
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 12161581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A fundamental problem of consent. Fact sheets may be useful.
    Rosen M
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6984):936-7. PubMed ID: 7719197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Serious professional misconduct arising out of dental anaesthesia and sedation.
    Smith RG; Alexander AD
    Br Dent J; 1992 Sep; 173(5):161-5. PubMed ID: 1389616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gynaecologist admonished for removing ovaries without consent.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Oct; 315(7112):832. PubMed ID: 11644959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UK gynaecologist found guilty of serious professional misconduct.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9083):1014. PubMed ID: 11655215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consent in general anaesthesia and sedation. A legal or conduct issue?
    Tiernan J
    SAAD Dig; 1995 Apr; 12(1-2):3-6. PubMed ID: 9477919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consent for anaesthesia.
    White SM; Baldwin TJ
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Aug; 58(8):760-74. PubMed ID: 12859468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent: I.
    Miller LJ
    JAMA; 1980 Nov; 244(18):2100-3. PubMed ID: 7431542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent: the problem of causation.
    Koopersmith ER
    Med Law; 1984; 3(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 6540354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A fundamental problem of consent. Consent forms are unhelpful.
    Paterson IC
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6984):936. PubMed ID: 7719194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vindicating the patient's rights: a comparative perspective.
    Giesen D
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():273-309. PubMed ID: 10126941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.