BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7828067)

  • 21. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
    Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
    Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Ekstrøm CT; Dalgaard P
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 12890922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Studies of methods and exploitation of computer software for mapping interactive genes].
    Huang WS; Zheng Y; Chen GB; Wu WR
    Yi Chuan; 2006 Oct; 28(10):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17035192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in multiple line crosses.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genetica; 2002 Apr; 114(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 12206360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genetic mapping in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Cartwright DA; Troggio M; Velasco R; Gutin A
    Genetics; 2007 Aug; 176(4):2521-7. PubMed ID: 17277374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Analysis of quantitative trait loci using hybrid pedigrees: quantitative traits of animals].
    Svishcheva GR
    Genetika; 2007 Feb; 43(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 17385327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. R/mpMap: a computational platform for the genetic analysis of multiparent recombinant inbred lines.
    Huang BE; George AW
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(5):727-9. PubMed ID: 21217121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maximum likelihood estimation based on Newton-Raphson iteration for the bivariate random effects model in test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Willis BH; Baragilly M; Coomar D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1197-1211. PubMed ID: 31184270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Calculation of multipoint likelihoods using flanking marker data: a simulation study.
    George AW; Mangin LA; Bartlett CW; Logue MW; Segre AM; Vieland VJ
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44. PubMed ID: 16451655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gene mapping of a simulated complex disease.
    Newman B; Lee M; Stillman L; Louie L; Anderson L; King MC
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 329():171-6. PubMed ID: 2622949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative trait loci influencing forking defects in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine.
    Xiong JS; McKeand SE; Isik F; Wegrzyn J; Neale DB; Zeng ZB; da Costa E Silva L; Whetten RW
    BMC Genet; 2016 Oct; 17(1):138. PubMed ID: 27756221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. General formulas for obtaining the MLEs and the asymptotic variance-covariance matrix in mapping quantitative trait loci when using the EM algorithm.
    Kao CH; Zeng ZB
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):653-65. PubMed ID: 9192455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers.
    Haley CS; Knott SA
    Heredity (Edinb); 1992 Oct; 69(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 16718932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A likelihood approach for quantitative-trait-locus mapping with selected pedigrees.
    Wang K
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 16011693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Methodology of mapping quantitative trait loci for discrete traits using maximum likelihood].
    Yin ZJ; Zhang Q; Chen HQ; Zhang JG; Ding XD; Wang CK
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Sep; 32(9):923-9. PubMed ID: 16201235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SMOOTH: a statistical method for successful removal of genotyping errors from high-density genetic linkage data.
    van Os H; Stam P; Visser RG; van Eck HJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2005 Dec; 112(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 16258753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new strategy for estimating two-locus recombination fractions under some natural inequality restrictions.
    Zhou Y; Ma W; Sheng X; Wang H
    J Genet; 2011 Aug; 90(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 21869475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linkage group correction using epistatic distorted markers in F2 and backcross populations.
    Xie SQ; Feng JY; Zhang YM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2014 May; 112(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 24595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Model-Based Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Cantor RM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():311-326. PubMed ID: 28980252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.