227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7828474)
1. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions.
Kimberley BP; Kimberley BM; Roth L
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Nov; 73(11):812-3, 817-23. PubMed ID: 7828474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distortion product emission features and the prediction of pure tone thresholds.
Kimberley BP
Laryngoscope; 1995 Apr; 105(4 Pt 1):349-53. PubMed ID: 7715375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emission and age.
Kimberley BP; Hernadi I; Lee AM; Brown DK
Ear Hear; 1994 Jun; 15(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 8076718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss with neural networks versus logistic regression modeling of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Ziavra N; Kastanioudakis I; Trikalinos TA; Skevas A; Ioannidis JP
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 14981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
Fetterman BL
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
Telischi F
Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss.
Kimberley BP; Nelson DA
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Dec; 18(7):365-9. PubMed ID: 2593222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the elderly.
Karzon RK; Garcia P; Peterein JL; Gates GA
Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):596-605. PubMed ID: 8572058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting hearing loss from otoacoustic emissions using an artificial neural network.
de Waal R; Hugo R; Soer M; Krüger JJ
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2002; 49():28-39. PubMed ID: 14968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss.
Shupak A; Tal D; Sharoni Z; Oren M; Ravid A; Pratt H
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study of the correspondence between pure tone and distorsion product otoacoustic emissions audiometrics: basis for an objective cochlear audiometrics model].
Jürgens A; Buisan A; Canela M; Abelló P
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 May; 50(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 10431072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
Aoyagi M; Yamazaki Y; Yokota M; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Itoh S; Watanabe T
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():6-10. PubMed ID: 8740802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of evoked otoacoustic emission in normal pure tone hearing thresholds patients with aural fullness].
Wu F; Liu J; Zhang Z; Bi W; Shen N
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 23(22):1023-6. PubMed ID: 20359097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures to auditory thresholds.
Balatsouras D; Kaberos A; Karapantzos E; Homsioglou E; Economou NC; Korres S
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Feb; 10(2):MT24-30. PubMed ID: 14737052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing.
Engdahl B; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 23216196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
