These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7828566)

  • 1. The contents of free-text endoscopy reports: an inventory and evaluation by peers.
    Moorman PW; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Siersema PD; van Blankenstein M; Wilson JH
    Endoscopy; 1994 Aug; 26(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 7828566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are referring physicians satisfied with endoscopy reports?
    Moorman PW; Siersema PD; van Ginneken AM; van Blankenstein M
    Z Gastroenterol; 1994 Nov; 32(11):623-5. PubMed ID: 7886970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Compliance with terminology standards in reflux, ulcers, and gastritis: A study of 881 consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy reports].
    Fritz N; Birkner B; Heldwein W; Rösch T
    Z Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):1001-6. PubMed ID: 11753784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of Barrett's surveillance in The Netherlands: a standardized review of endoscopy and pathology reports.
    Curvers WL; Peters FP; Elzer B; Schaap AJ; Baak LC; van Oijen A; Mallant-Hent RM; Ten Kate F; Krishnadath KK; Bergman JJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 20(7):601-7. PubMed ID: 18679060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization and quality of endoscopy text reports in ulcerative colitis.
    de Lange T; Moum BA; Tholfsen JK; Larsen S; Aabakken L
    Endoscopy; 2003 Oct; 35(10):835-40. PubMed ID: 14551861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge.
    Moorman PW; van Ginneken AM; Siersema PD; van der Lei J; van Bemmel JH
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1995; 2(6):365-73. PubMed ID: 8581552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midazolam-pain, but one cannot remember it: a survey among Southern German endoscopists.
    von Delius S; Hollweck R; Schmid RM; Frimberger E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jun; 19(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 17489056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.
    Krist AH; Jones RM; Woolf SH; Woessner SE; Merenstein D; Kerns JW; Foliaco W; Jackson P
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Dec; 33(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 18022063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A score card for upper GI endoscopy: Evaluation of interobserver variability in examiners with various levels of experience.
    Neumann M; Friedl S; Meining A; Egger K; Heldwein W; Rey JF; Hochberger J; Classen M; Hohenberger W; Rösch T
    Z Gastroenterol; 2002 Oct; 40(10):857-62. PubMed ID: 12436351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized endoscopic reporting is no more time-consuming than reporting with conventional methods.
    Soekhoe JK; Groenen MJ; van Ginneken AM; Khaliq G; Lesterhuis W; van Tilburg AJ; Ouwendijk RJ
    Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Jul; 18(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 17574108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Delphi approach to reach consensus on primary care guidelines regarding youth violence prevention.
    De Vos E; Spivak H; Hatmaker-Flanigan E; Sege RD
    Pediatrics; 2006 Oct; 118(4):e1109-15. PubMed ID: 17015502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does this patient have Barrett's esophagus? The utility of predicting Barrett's esophagus at the index endoscopy.
    Eloubeidi MA; Provenzale D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Apr; 94(4):937-43. PubMed ID: 10201460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality of care in Barrett's esophagus: endoscopist and pathologist practices.
    Ofman JJ; Shaheen NJ; Desai AA; Moody B; Bozymski EM; Weinstein WM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Mar; 96(3):876-81. PubMed ID: 11280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data.
    Gouveia-Oliveira A; Raposo VD; Salgado NC; Almeida I; Nobre-Leitão C; de Melo FG
    Endoscopy; 1991 Nov; 23(6):334-7. PubMed ID: 1778139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A scientific relational database combined with a report generator for endoscopy in networks: EndoNet.
    Sackmann M; Rosette R; Busl T; Sauter G; Fischer G; Hengstenberg T; Weinzierl M; Holl J; Jung MC; Klueppelberg UG; Paumgartner G
    Endoscopy; 1998 Sep; 30(7):610-6. PubMed ID: 9826139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.
    Chan TH; Goh KL
    Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16412034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.
    Ben-Horin S; Bar-Meir S; Avidan B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Dec; 102(12):2680-5. PubMed ID: 17714555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopists' opinions of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Sutherland LR; Verhoef MJ; Meddings JB; Bailey RJ; Blustein PB; Lalor EA; Thomson AB; Van Rosendaal GM
    Can J Gastroenterol; 1997 Apr; 11(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9167029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerisation of endoscopy reports using standard reports and text blocks.
    Groenen MJ; Kuipers EJ; van Berge Henegouwen GP; Fockens P; Ouwendijk RJ
    Neth J Med; 2006 Mar; 64(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 16547359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are biopsy forceps helpful in the endoscopic evaluation of ulcer diameter?
    Cardin F; Farini R; Piccoli A; Martin A; Vianello F; Di Mario F; Naccarato R
    Endoscopy; 1983 Jul; 15(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 6884279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.