212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7829413)
1. Comparison of cefoperazone plus sulbactam with clindamycin plus gentamicin as treatment for intra-abdominal infections.
Greenberg RN; Cayavec P; Danko LS; Bowen K; Montazemi R; Kearney PA; Johnson SB; Strodel WE
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1994 Sep; 34(3):391-401. PubMed ID: 7829413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized clinical study of cefoperazone and sulbactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Jauregui LE; Appelbaum PC; Fabian TC; Hageage G; Strausbaugh L; Martin LF
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1990 Mar; 25(3):423-33. PubMed ID: 2187014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S583-8. PubMed ID: 2879345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicentered study of cefoperazone for treatment of intraabdominal infections and comparison of cefoperazone with cefamandole and clindamycin plus gentamicin for treatment of appendicitis and peritonitis.
Baird IM
Rev Infect Dis; 1983; 5 Suppl 1():S165-72. PubMed ID: 6221387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy of cefoperazone, cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, and penicillin G against anaerobic bacteria in an animal model.
Moody JA; Fasching CE; Sinn LM; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
J Lab Clin Med; 1990 Feb; 115(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 1967626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.
Eur J Surg Suppl; 1994; (573):61-6. PubMed ID: 7524798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of parenteral ticarcillin/clavulanate and clindamycin/gentamicin in serious intra-abdominal infections.
Fink MP; Helsmoortel CM; Arous EJ; Doern GV; Moriarty KP; Fairchild PG; Townsend PL
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Nov; 24 Suppl B():147-56. PubMed ID: 2691476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized comparison of sulbactam/cefoperazone with imipenem as empirical monotherapy for febrile granulocytopenic patients.
Winston DJ; Bartoni K; Bruckner DA; Schiller GJ; Territo MC
Clin Infect Dis; 1998 Mar; 26(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 9524826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.
Reinhardt JF; Johnston L; Ruane P; Johnson CC; Ingram-drake L; MacDonald K; Ward KW; Mathisen G; George WL; Finegold SM
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S569-75. PubMed ID: 3026005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cefoperazone versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for obstetric and gynecologic infections.
Gilstrap LC; St Clair PJ; Gibbs RS; Maier RC
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1986 Nov; 30(5):808-9. PubMed ID: 3800359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piperacillin/tazobactam in comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Shyr YM; Lui WY; Su CH; Wang LS; Liu CY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1995 Aug; 56(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 7553416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective, randomized comparison of metronidazole and clindamycin, each with gentamicin, for the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infection.
Surgery; 1983 Jan; 93(1 Pt 2):221-9. PubMed ID: 6849209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given in combination to infected, seriously ill, elderly patients.
Schwartz JI; Jauregui LE; Bachmann KA; Martin ME; Reitberg DP
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 May; 32(5):730-5. PubMed ID: 3395103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ampicillin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of postpartum endometritis.
Gall S; Koukol DH
J Reprod Med; 1996 Aug; 41(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 8866384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro assessment of sulbactam plus cefoperazone in the treatment of bacteria isolated from cancer patients.
Bodey GP; Miller P; Ho DH
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989; 12(4 Suppl):209S-214S. PubMed ID: 2591178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of cefoperazone/sulbactam in neonates.
Ovali F; Gursoy T; Sari I; Divrikli D; Aktas A
Pediatr Int; 2012 Feb; 54(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 21883691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of intra-abdominal infections: cost comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin/gentamicin.
Chin A; Gill MA; Ito MK; Yellin AE; Berne TV; Heseltine PN; Appleman MD
Hosp Formul; 1990 Mar; 25(3):295-6, 303-5. PubMed ID: 10103837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of ampicillin plus sulbactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin for treatment of postpartum infection.
McGregor JA; Christensen FB
Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 2():35-9. PubMed ID: 2803579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sulbactam/cefoperazone versus cefotaxime for the treatment of moderate-to-severe bacterial infections: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Li JT; Lu Y; Hou J; Chen YF; Miao JZ; Jia YX; Hou J; Zhang XZ; Chen DK; Hu WZ; Li LJ; Liu DM; Wang Z; Wu J; Gu JM; Wang HL; Zhang YL; Sun L
Clin Infect Dis; 1997 Mar; 24(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 9114206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of dactimicin plus clindamycin compared with gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal infections in rats.
Nord CE; Lahnborg G
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1990; 16(8):403-6. PubMed ID: 2097144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
