These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7829752)

  • 1. Evaluation of the use of an artificial teat to measure the forces applied by a milking machine teatcup liner.
    Adley NJ; Butler MC
    J Dairy Res; 1994 Nov; 61(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 7829752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in rubber chemistry and dynamic mechanical properties of the milking liner barrel with age.
    Boast D; Hale M; Turner D; Hillerton JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jun; 91(6):2247-56. PubMed ID: 18487647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compressive load applied by the teatcup liner to the bovine teat.
    Mein GA; Williams DM; Thiel CC
    J Dairy Res; 1987 Aug; 54(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 3655068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cyclic pressure applied to cows' teats by teatcup liners can be determined simply and noninvasively.
    Thompson PD; Dzidic A; Mein GA; Penry JF; Sanford SA; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 33309351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of teatcup liner tension on teat canal keratin and teat condition in cows.
    Capuco AV; Wood DL; Quast JW
    J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 11037229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting mouthpiece chamber vacuum in machine milking.
    Borkhus M; Rønningen O
    J Dairy Res; 2003 Aug; 70(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12916822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
    Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological responses of the bovine teat to milking: information from measurements of milk flow-rate within single pulsation cycles.
    Williams DM; Mein GA; Brown MR
    J Dairy Res; 1981 Feb; 48(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7196411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short communication: Teat wall diameter and teat tissue thickness in dairy cows are affected by intramammary pressure and by the mechanical forces of machine milking.
    Odorcic M; Blau U; Löfstrand J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):884-889. PubMed ID: 31733859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverse pressure gradients across the teat canal related to machine milking.
    Rasmussen MD; Frimer ES; Decker EL
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):984-93. PubMed ID: 8201056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liner wall movement and vacuum measured by data acquisition.
    Spencer SB; Jones LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 May; 83(5):1110-4. PubMed ID: 10821587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods of estimating liner compression.
    Leonardi S; Penry JF; Tangorra FM; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Oct; 98(10):6905-12. PubMed ID: 26254519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure distribution at the teat-liner and teat-calf interfaces.
    van der Tol PP; Schrader W; Aernouts B
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jan; 93(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 20059903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in cow teat tissue created by two types of milking cluster.
    Hillerton JE; Ohnstad I; Baines JR; Leach KA
    J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 11037228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a multi-sided concave liner barrel design on thickness and roughness of teat-end hyperkeratosis.
    Haeussermann A; Britten J; Britten A; Pahl C; Älveby N; Hartung E
    J Dairy Res; 2016 May; 83(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 27210492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of overmilking and liner type and characteristics on teat tissue in small ruminants.
    Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Res; 2014 May; 81(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 24594275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of manual and mechanical stimulation on oxytocin release and milking characteristics in Holstein cows milked 3 times daily.
    Watters RD; Bruckmaier RM; Crawford HM; Schuring N; Schukken YH; Galton DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1721-9. PubMed ID: 25582591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pulsation rest phase duration on teat end congestion.
    Upton J; Penry JF; Rasmussen MD; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 May; 99(5):3958-3965. PubMed ID: 26947293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.