These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7830486)

  • 1. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing.
    Springer EW
    Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duties and potential liability of nonhospital entities in credentialing physicians.
    Griffith RL
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 10160755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review, privileges: MDs fear legal tangles.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1989 Dec; 63(23):28-9, 31, 33. PubMed ID: 2583696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Feb; 23(2):42-52. PubMed ID: 10106379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal liability and credentialing.
    Kitch RA
    Mich Hosp; 1987 May; 23(5):7-9. PubMed ID: 10281884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: an overview of its immunity provisions.
    Miles JJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 10284641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
    Horoschak MJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny.
    LaCava FW
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital credentialing.
    Cowan RB; Montgomery CR
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1987 Jan; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3820289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review in the wake of Patrick.
    McCormick B
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services: Part III.
    Hershey N
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 May; 5(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 2136667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations.
    Valiant C
    Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. If you should lose a peer review suit.
    Holoweiko M
    Med Econ; 1988 Dec; 65(24):140-4, 147-8, 150-1 passim. PubMed ID: 10290905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review after Patrick case is alive and well.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(20):34. PubMed ID: 3169708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.
    Purtell DL
    Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Patrick case: will it hinder peer review?
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(12):56. PubMed ID: 3378770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.