126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7832679)
21. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark.
Qvist V; Qvist J; Mjör IA
Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Oct; 48(5):305-11. PubMed ID: 2251919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term clinical evaluation of fracture and pulp injury following glass-ionomer cement or composite resin applied as a base filling in teeth restored with amalgam.
De C Luz MA; Ciaramicoli-Rodrigues MT; Garone Netto N; De Lima AC
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):634-9. PubMed ID: 11422695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?
Scott JM; Mahoney EK
N Z Dent J; 2003 Sep; 99(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 15328832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial.
Maru VP; Kulkarni P; Chauhan R; Bapat SS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 36260469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
Forss H; Widström E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway.
Tveit AB; Espelid I; Skodje F
Int Dent J; 1999 Jun; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 10858750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.
Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
Croll TP
ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
