These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7832680)
1. Clinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic+ amalgam alloys. Smales RJ; Gerke DC Aust Dent J; 1994 Dec; 39(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 7832680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valiant-PhD and Lojic N amalgam alloys: four-year clinical results. Smales RJ; Rupinskas L Aust Dent J; 1991 Aug; 36(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 1789763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars. Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Osorio LB; Hadani PE; Pinto AS Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ; Wetherell JD Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of sealers and liners on marginal leakage of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. Ng BP; Hood JA; Purton DG Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 9863443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy. Osborne JW; Berry TG Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study. Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study. Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]