These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7832680)

  • 1. Clinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic+ amalgam alloys.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Aust Dent J; 1994 Dec; 39(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 7832680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valiant-PhD and Lojic N amalgam alloys: four-year clinical results.
    Smales RJ; Rupinskas L
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Aug; 36(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 1789763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year clinical performance of eight amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 2076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of three amalgam alloys.
    Tyas MJ; Ewers GJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8373297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoration deterioration related to later failure.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 8152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical behaviour of high-copper amalgams with time, site, size and class of cavity preparation.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC; Hume WR
    J Dent; 1990 Feb; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2312889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Osorio LB; Hadani PE; Pinto AS
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sealers and liners on marginal leakage of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Hood JA; Purton DG
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 9863443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corrosion sealing of amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Mahler DB; Pham BV; Adey JD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 19544821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study.
    Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.