These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7832680)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of high-copper amalgams.
    Berry TG; Osborne JS; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 8599586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: a clinical survey.
    McDaniel RJ; Davis RD; Murchison DF; Cohen RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Feb; 131(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 10680384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period.
    van der Merwe WJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Dec; 47(12):521-5. PubMed ID: 9511639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams.
    Mair LH
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A high-copper amalgam evaluated after three years in city and country practices.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    J Dent Res; 1986 Nov; 65(11):1353-5. PubMed ID: 3478397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of rubber dam isolation on restoration deterioration.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 1299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of high copper amalgam restorations.
    Rydinge E; Goldberg J; Sanchez L; Lambert K; Munster E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Nov; 8(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 7031204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of the condensation instrument on the clinical behaviour of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Mar; 14(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3470463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.