114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7832841)
1. American science in crisis: the need to revise the NIH funding policy.
Musacchio JM
FASEB J; 1994 Jul; 8(10):679-83. PubMed ID: 7832841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Information access. NIH public access policy.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5703):1895. PubMed ID: 15591188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Warren joins lawmakers proposing new ideas for science funding.
Dove A
Nat Med; 2015 Apr; 21(4):299. PubMed ID: 25849263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Catch 22 in the NIH peer review system.
Rosenberg E
Med Hypotheses; 1976; 2(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 933910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies.
Costello LC
Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 20520024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Congress passes NIH bill.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1985 Nov; 230(4725):525. PubMed ID: 4048946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. science policy. The battle over the 2011 budget: what's at stake for research.
Mervis J
Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6013):14-5. PubMed ID: 21212327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. science policy. Nobelists go four-on-one with Cheney.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1487. PubMed ID: 14645816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research funding.
FASEB J; 1991 Sep; 5(12):2741-2. PubMed ID: 1916097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fighting the NIH funding crisis.
Rosen MR; Oparil S
Circulation; 1995 May; 91(10):2502. PubMed ID: 7743607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The public governance of science.
Fredrickson DS
Man Med; 1978; 3(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 10316648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
Mervis J
Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6221):466-7. PubMed ID: 25635067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical funding. At NIH, two strikes policy is out.
Kaiser J
Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6182):350. PubMed ID: 24763564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Glocal" science advocacy.
Leshner AI
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A national policy for biomedical and behavioral research: position of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Berne R; Cooper T; Skinner D; Sanders C; Whybrow PC; Halvorson H; Dodge PR; Thier SO; Morgan TE; Dolan KS
Clin Res; 1979 Feb; 27(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10241606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH funding policy.
Greenspan NS; Kaplan DR
FASEB J; 1994 Nov; 8(14):1203; author reply 1203-4. PubMed ID: 7958630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH funding policy.
Edgington TS
FASEB J; 1994 Nov; 8(14):1203; author reply 1203-4. PubMed ID: 7958629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
Malakoff D
Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased NIH funding no longer sacrosanct.
Louis C; Ballin S
Circulation; 1995 Aug; 92(3):278. PubMed ID: 7634435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
