These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7833178)
1. Artifacts in MR imaging caused by small quantities of powdered iron. Alanen A; Bondestam S; Komu M Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 7833178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging. Barish MA; Jara H Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study. Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters. Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Artifacts induced by dental reconstruction materials: the case of titanium]. Savane S; N'Dindin AC; N'Dindin GB; Kouame PA; Doyon D Odontostomatol Trop; 2001 Sep; 24(95):33-7. PubMed ID: 11808373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Artifacts in MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint caused by dental alloys: a phantom model study at T1.5]. Fellner C; Behr M; Fellner F; Held P; Handel G; Feuerbach S Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 9198515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts. Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diffusion weighted MR: principles and clinical use in selected brain diseases]. Nistri M; Mascalchi M; Moretti M; Tessa C; Politi LS; Orlandi I; Pellicanò G; Villari N Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):470-9. PubMed ID: 11307509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating intrathecal catheter tip granulomas from normal magnetic resonance image distortion caused by metallic catheter tips. Magill ST; Wang P; Eller JL; Burchiel KJ Neurosurgery; 2008 Jan; 62(1):242-8; discussion 248. PubMed ID: 18300913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Role of magnetic resonance in the follow-up o hepatocarcinoma treated with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)]. De Cobelli F; Castrucci M; Sironi S; Livraghi T; Venturini M; Salvioni M; Del Maschio A Radiol Med; 1994 Dec; 88(6):806-17. PubMed ID: 7878241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Phased-array superficial coil and breath holding technique in MRI of the liver. Comparison of conventional spin echo sequences with rapid fat suppressing gradient echo and turbo-spin sequences]. Helmberger T; Holzknecht N; Lackerbauer CA; Müller-Lisse U; Schnarkowski P; Gauger J; Reiser M Radiologe; 1995 Dec; 35(12):919-24. PubMed ID: 8584635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-selective fat suppression MR imaging. Localized asymmetric failure of fat suppression mimicking orbital disease. Borges AR; Lufkin RB; Huang AY; Farahani K; Arnold AC J Neuroophthalmol; 1997 Mar; 17(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 9093955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials]. Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hepatic and hepatocarcinoma magnetic resonance: comparison of the results obtained with paramagnetic (gadolinium) and superparamagnetic (iron oxide particles) contrast media]. Castoldi MC; Fauda V; Scaramuzza D; Vergnaghi D Radiol Med; 2000 Sep; 100(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 11148882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences. Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing T2-weighted magnetic resonance sequences for surface coil microimaging of the eye with regard to lid, eyeball and head moving artifacts. Obata T; Uemura K; Nonaka H; Tamura M; Tanada S; Ikehira H Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jan; 24(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16410184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Senile plaques do not induce susceptibility effects in T2*-weighted MR microscopic images. Dhenain M; Privat N; Duyckaerts C; Jacobs RE NMR Biomed; 2002 May; 15(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 11968135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Signal alterations, artifacts and image distortion induced by a superparamagnetic contrast medium. A phantom study in a 0.3 tesla MR system. Holtås S; Wallengren NO; Ericsson A; Bach-Gansmo T Acta Radiol; 1990 Mar; 31(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 2372467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of radiographic screening for metallic particles in the equine foot and size of related artifacts on low-field MRI. Urraca del Junco CI; Shaw DJ; Weaver MP; Schwarz T Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 21831245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]