151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7833634)
41. Advance directives in emergency medicine: medical, legal, and ethical implications.
Siner DA
Ann Emerg Med; 1989 Dec; 18(12):1364-9. PubMed ID: 2589707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Nursing and genetics: applying the American Nurses Association's Code of Ethics.
Dugas R
J Prof Nurs; 2005; 21(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15806508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. What to do when the family cannot agree to withdraw life support.
Hyde YM; Kautz DD; Jordan M
Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2013; 32(6):276-9. PubMed ID: 24100426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Pain medication for the patient following treatment withdrawal.
Morray B
Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1995; 14(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 7889804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Undertaking the role of patient advocate: a longitudinal study of nursing students.
Altun I; Ersoy N
Nurs Ethics; 2003 Sep; 10(5):462-71. PubMed ID: 14529113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. End of life decisions: nurses perceptions, feelings and experiences.
McMillen RE
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2008 Aug; 24(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 18162401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Practices of responsibility and nurses during the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany: a discussion paper.
Berghs M; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Gastmans C
Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 16824527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How do we withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy?
Rieth KA
Nurs Manage; 1999 Oct; 30(10):20-5; quiz 25-6. PubMed ID: 15116442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Autonomy, responsibility and the Italian Code of Deontology for Nurses.
Barazzetti G; Radaelli S; Sala R
Nurs Ethics; 2007 Jan; 14(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 17334173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Not for resuscitation: two decades of challenge for nursing ethics and practice.
Schultz L
Nurs Ethics; 1997 May; 4(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 9233233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ethical decision making in oncology: a case study approach.
Ferrell BR; Rivera LM
Cancer Pract; 1995; 3(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 7704076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
Reckling JB
Medsurg Nurs; 1995 Aug; 4(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 7627242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Is the ANA guilty of paternalism in its guidelines on withdrawing or withholding food and fluid?
Light K; Connelly R
Nurs Forum; 1989; 24(3-4):19-23. PubMed ID: 2638476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Withdrawal of nutritional support: a family's choice.
Kowalski S
Gastroenterol Nurs; 1996; 19(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8704007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. In defence of patient/person human rights within national health care provision: implications for British nursing.
Driscoll J
Nurs Ethics; 1997 Jan; 4(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 9052183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A phenomenological study of ethical decision-making experiences among senior intensive care nurses and doctors concerning withdrawal of treatment.
Viney C
Nurs Crit Care; 1996; 1(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 9594107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Patient self-determination and the artificial prolongation of life.
Osman H; Perlin TM
Health Soc Work; 1994 Nov; 19(4):245-52. PubMed ID: 7813962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Advance directives: the New Zealand context.
Wareham P; McCallin A; Diesfeld K
Nurs Ethics; 2005 Jul; 12(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 16045243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Ethical issues and the importance of consensus for the intensive care team.
Melia KM
Soc Sci Med; 2001 Sep; 53(6):707-19. PubMed ID: 11511047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ethics in perioperative practice--patient advocacy.
Schroeter K
AORN J; 2002 May; 75(5):941-4, 949. PubMed ID: 12063943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]