These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7835114)

  • 1. [Detection of uterine scar defect during pregnancy by ultrasonics].
    Yang TZ; Li WZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):458-60, 508-9. PubMed ID: 7835114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.
    Klemm P; Koehler C; Mangler M; Schneider U; Schneider A
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
    Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of echography in the management of labor in women with uterine scar after cesarean section].
    Belousov MA; Mareeva LS; Mel'nikov AP
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):49-50. PubMed ID: 1755493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Echographic and morphological parallels in the evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar].
    Lebedev VA; Strizhakov AN; Zheleznov BI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):44-9. PubMed ID: 1755492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
    Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of early pregnancy on a previous lower segment cesarean section scar.
    Weimin W; Wenqing L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jun; 77(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 12065130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery.
    Zhu Z; Li H; Zhang J
    Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1265-1269. PubMed ID: 34309465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.
    Yasmin S; Sadaf J; Fatima N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Sep; 21(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 21914406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complication of cesarean section: pregnancy on the cicatrix of a previous cesarean section.
    Wang W; Long W; Yu Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Feb; 115(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 11940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonographic Findings and Diagnostic Pitfalls in Evaluation for Uterine Rupture in a Case of Fetal Demise and Prior Cesarean Delivery of Unknown Type.
    Spain JA; Shaikh S; Sandberg SA
    Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 28081020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New ultrasonographic risk assessment of uterine scar dehiscence in pregnancy after cesarean section.
    Kawakami K; Yoshizato T; Kurokawa Y; Okura N; Ushijima K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 36536061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy at 16 weeks.
    Smith A; Ash A; Maxwell D
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 May; 35(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 17366559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The ultrasonic assessment of the cicatrix after a past cesarean section].
    Popov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1994; 33(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 7485767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Asakura H; Nakai A; Ishikawa G; Suzuki S; Araki T
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2000 Oct; 67(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 11031364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound Predictability of Lower Uterine Segment Cesarean Section Scar Thickness.
    Tazion S; Hafeez M; Manzoor R; Rana T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 May; 28(5):361-364. PubMed ID: 29690964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus.
    Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Phillippe HJ; Nisand I
    Lancet; 1996 Feb; 347(8997):281-4. PubMed ID: 8569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.