These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7835503)

  • 1. Registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Samarabandu J; Allen K; Hausmann E; Acharya R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 7835503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF; Ponce A; Fenesy K; Shah S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8375559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction radiography.
    Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 8224332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
    Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The development of digital subtraction radiography in dentistry--a review].
    Brägger U
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1988; 98(11):1200-7. PubMed ID: 3059488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital subtraction radiography for assessing alveolar bone grafts: diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity.
    Maruko EY; Forbes DP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 8148133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl HG; Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 11114663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved diagnosis with digital radiography.
    van der Stelt PF
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Dec; 2():1-6. PubMed ID: 1298452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Groenhuis RA
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 6379007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of digital radiography to implantology.
    Jeffcoat MK
    J Dent Symp; 1993 Aug; 1():30-3. PubMed ID: 8186833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subtraction radiography.
    Vannier MW
    J Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 67(9):949-50. PubMed ID: 8884654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A contrast-correction method for digital subtraction radiography.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Yamada N
    J Periodontal Res; 1988 Jul; 23(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 2972824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography.
    Kravitz LH; Tyndall DA; Bagnell CP; Dove SB
    J Endod; 1992 Jun; 18(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 1402585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardized lateral oblique projection of the mandible for digital subtraction radiography.
    Araki K; Kitamori H; Yoshiura K; Okuda H; Ohki M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1397463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography.
    Ruttimann UE; Webber RL; Schmidt E
    J Periodontal Res; 1986 Sep; 21(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 2946849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.