83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7835508)
1. Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film.
Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7835508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A radiographic method for measuring radiation dose based on beam quality.
Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 9879218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Energy imparted and effective dose equivalent in radiographic examination using panoramic and intraoral film techniques: a survey].
Sewerin I
Tandlaegebladet; 1989 Jul; 93(10):351-6. PubMed ID: 2699680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collective dose to the Swedish population from intraoral radiography.
Stenström B; Bergman K; Blomgren PG; Henrikson CO
Swed Dent J; 1988; 12(1-2):17-25. PubMed ID: 3164913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection.
Jacobs R; Vanderstappen M; Bogaerts R; Gijbels F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 15585812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of collimator size of a dental X-ray unit on image contrast.
Falk A; Lindhe JE; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 10490742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy imparted from intraoral radiography.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Karlsson L; Sarby B
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):125-36. PubMed ID: 3466375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
