BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7835508)

  • 21. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
    Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
    N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of six intra-oral X-ray films.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8617390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiological characteristics of lead foils in dental film packets: analysis of components and shielding effect.
    Araki K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1397446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose reduction of intraoral dental radiography in Spain.
    Alcaraz M; Navarro C; Vicente V; Canteras M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 16798929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
    Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A radiographic quality control system for the dental office.
    Gould RG; Gratt BM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1982; 11(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 6962153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An overview of radiographic film holders.
    Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Mar; 34(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15829687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Radiation protection and quality assurance in dental radiography. A treatise from the European Community].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 9289750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parameters affecting radiographic contrast.
    Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):173-7. PubMed ID: 2097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. E-Speed dental film, time to take a new look?
    Jones GA; Burton EL
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1992 Apr; 72(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 1625454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.