These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7835511)

  • 1. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 7835511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective uses of radiographs for implant placements--panographs, cephalograms, CT scans.
    Kraut RA
    Dent Implantol Update; 1993 Apr; 4(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 8298153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.
    Scaf G; Lurie AG; Mosier KM; Kantor ML; Ramsby GR; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jan; 83(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 9007922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques.
    Clark DE; Danforth RA; Barnes RW; Burtch ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 2098559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic techniques for presurgical assessment of dental implant sites.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NH; Goshorn BI
    Gen Dent; 1992; 40(6):502-5, 509-10. PubMed ID: 1298675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
    Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
    Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant imaging for the dentist.
    Mupparapu M; Singer SR
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 70(1):32. PubMed ID: 14709253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11280366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12498461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic stents: integrating treatment planning and implant placement.
    De Kok IJ; Thalji G; Bryington M; Cooper LF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):181-92. PubMed ID: 24286652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments.
    Reiskin AB
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9421669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conversion of an implant radiographic template into a surgical template.
    Sykaras N; Woody RD
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 11512118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Preoperative planning for the placement of a single implant].
    Jacobs R
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 May; 106(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 11930365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment.
    Dula K; Mini R; Lambrecht JT; van der Stelt PF; Schneeberger P; Clemens G; Sanderink H; Buser D
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Apr; 105(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 9151064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.