127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7835525)
1. The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: comparison with plain films.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7835525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.
Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Endo T; Ikeda M
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7734536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers.
Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Dallas W; Fan J
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 16142436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of viewing conditions on radiological diagnosis of periapical inflammation.
Patel N; Rushton VE; Macfarlane TV; Horner K
Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10967823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quantitative analysis of clinical usefulness of CRT monitor diagnosis by using previous and current chest images with simulated lung nodules].
Sasaki Y; Katsuragawa S; Yoneda Y; Takeda S; Yanagisawa T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 56(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 8692651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visually detectable resolution of intraoral dental films.
Künzel A; Scherkowski D; Willers R; Becker J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search.
Krupinski E; Roehrig H; Furukawa T
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jul; 6(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 10410166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CRT monitor display for personal computer in the detection of small lung nodules: with particular emphasis on comparison between JPEG and wavelet compression].
Kihara Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Apr; 61(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 11398347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of Emergency Department radiographs: a comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display.
Eng J; Mysko WK; Weller GE; Renard R; Gitlin JN; Bluemke DA; Magid D; Kelen GD; Scott WW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1233-8. PubMed ID: 11044013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
