These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7836971)

  • 1. Comparison of the sphygmooscillographic method with the direct and auscultatory methods of measuring blood pressure.
    Sapinski A
    J Clin Monit; 1994 Nov; 10(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 7836971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of arterial blood pressure using the sphygmomanometer-S and the direct method].
    Sapiński A; Szuman J; Jasiński J
    Kardiol Pol; 1991; 35(9):174-6. PubMed ID: 1753563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The San Antonio Biethnic Children's Blood Pressure Study: auscultatory findings.
    Menard SW; Park MK; Yuan CH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1999; 13(5):237-44. PubMed ID: 10776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards.
    Ling J; Ohara Y; Orime Y; Noon GP; Takatani S
    J Clin Monit; 1995 Mar; 11(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7760085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
    Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
    Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of the automatic sphygmo-oscillographic and auscultation methods of blood pressure measurements].
    Sapiński A; Swidzińska S; Sapiński F
    Kardiol Pol; 1991; 34(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 2051710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
    Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
    Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between oscillometric and auscultatory methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in hemodialysis patients.
    Fagugli RM; Vecchi L; Valente F; Santirosi P; Laviola MM
    Clin Nephrol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 12005244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric method.
    Pessenhofer H
    Basic Res Cardiol; 1986; 81(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 3718426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessment of auscultatory blood pressure measurements versus intra-arterial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation].
    Ochiai H; Mitake A; Miyata T; Ishigami T; Ashino K; Sumita S; Miyazaki N; Ishii M
    J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 29(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 9211092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement of Oscillometric and Auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods: An ambulance noise simulation study.
    Tatliparmak AC; Yilmaz S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2023 May; 67():120-125. PubMed ID: 36870252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical comparison of automated auscultatory and oscillometric and catheter-transducer measurements of arterial pressure.
    Davis RF
    J Clin Monit; 1985 Apr; 1(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 3831250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection.
    Clark JA; Lieh-Lai MW; Sarnaik A; Mattoo TK
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):920-3. PubMed ID: 12415030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.