214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7837330)
1. Evaluation of pelvic masses with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography.
Jain KA; Jeffrey RB
J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):845-53. PubMed ID: 7837330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.
Jain KA; Friedman DL; Pettinger TW; Alagappan R; Jeffrey RB; Sommer FG
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):697-704. PubMed ID: 8430177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adnexal masses: MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US and CT correlation.
Mitchell DG; Mintz MC; Spritzer CE; Gussman D; Arger PH; Coleman BG; Axel L; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 3541026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pelvic masses in childhood: ultrasonographic imaging].
Kis E; Verebély T; Máttyus I; Rényi I
Orv Hetil; 1991 Nov; 132(47):2609-12. PubMed ID: 1956684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images.
Thurnher SA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Dec; 159(6):1243-50. PubMed ID: 1442393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection and characterization of adnexal masses.
Funt SA; Hann LE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 12117195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Solving the problem pelvic ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging.
Levine D
Ultrasound Q; 2006 Sep; 22(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 16957610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging techniques for the pre-surgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours.
Kaijser J; Vandecaveye V; Deroose CM; Rockall A; Thomassin-Naggara I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):683-95. PubMed ID: 24780415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Teratomas versus cystic hemorrhagic adnexal lesions: differentiation with proton-selective fat-saturation MR imaging.
Stevens SK; Hricak H; Campos Z
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):481-8. PubMed ID: 8421755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure.
Komatsu T; Konishi I; Mandai M; Togashi K; Kawakami S; Konishi J; Mori T
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8539360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adnexal masses.
Troiano RN; McCarthy S
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1994 Feb; 15(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 8179941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological reasoning: imaging characterization of bilateral adnexal masses.
Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3 Suppl):S460-6. PubMed ID: 16928898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adnexal structures: MR imaging.
Dooms GC; Hricak H; Tscholakoff D
Radiology; 1986 Mar; 158(3):639-46. PubMed ID: 3511501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of the female pelvic region.
Olson MC; Posniak HV; Tempany CM; Dudiak CM
Radiographics; 1992 May; 12(3):445-65. PubMed ID: 1609137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pictorial essay: transabdominal and endovaginal sonography of adnexal masses.
Jain KA; Jeffrey RB
Clin Imaging; 1991; 15(4):245-52. PubMed ID: 1742672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
Thomassin-Naggara I; Fedida B; Sadowski E; Chevrier MC; Chabbert-Buffet N; Ballester M; Tavolaro S; Darai E
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():200-208. PubMed ID: 28668416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging.
Togashi K; Nishimura K; Kimura I; Tsuda Y; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Konishi I; Mori T
Radiology; 1991 Jul; 180(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 2052726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
