98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7838223)
1. [Providing patients with an audio recording of the outpatient oncological consultation; experiences of patients and physicians].
Ong LM; de Haes JC; Kruyver IP; de Reijke TM; Lammes FB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 7838223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of providing audiotapes of primary treatment consultations to men with prostate cancer: a multi-site, randomized, controlled trial.
Hack TF; Pickles T; Bultz BD; Ruether JD; Degner LF
Psychooncology; 2007 Jun; 16(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 16991107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Taping outpatient consultations: a survey of attitudes and responses of adult patients with ocular malignancy.
Ah-Fat FG; Sharma MC; Damato BE
Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 5)():789-91. PubMed ID: 10070510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomised clinical trial of providing patients with audiotape recordings of their oesophagogastric cancer consultations.
Stephens MR; Gaskell AL; Gent C; Pellard S; Day-Thompson R; Blackshaw GR; Lewis WG
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 18513915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of providing audiotapes of primary adjuvant treatment consultations to women with breast cancer: a multisite, randomized, controlled trial.
Hack TF; Pickles T; Bultz BD; Ruether JD; Weir LM; Degner LF; Mackey JR
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4138-44. PubMed ID: 14615442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consultation audio-tapes: an information aid, and a quality assurance and research tool.
Tattersall MH
Support Care Cancer; 2002 Apr; 10(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11904786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The addition of an audiocassette recording of a consultation to written recommendations for patients with advanced cancer: A randomized, controlled trial.
Bruera E; Pituskin E; Calder K; Neumann CM; Hanson J
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2420-5. PubMed ID: 10590386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors.
Siminoff LA; Graham GC; Gordon NH
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Sep; 62(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 16860520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients' and physicians' perspective.
van Kleffens T; van Baarsen B; van Leeuwen E
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2325-36. PubMed ID: 15047088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why do primary care physicians propose medical care to patients with medically unexplained symptoms? A new method of sequence analysis to test theories of patient pressure.
Salmon P; Humphris GM; Ring A; Davies JC; Dowrick CF
Psychosom Med; 2006; 68(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 16868266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: a randomized, double-blind study.
Ong LM; Visser MR; Lammes FB; van Der Velden J; Kuenen BC; de Haes JC
J Clin Oncol; 2000 Aug; 18(16):3052-60. PubMed ID: 10944140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Promoting consultation recording practice in oncology: identification of critical implementation factors and determination of patient benefit.
Hack TF; Ruether JD; Weir LM; Grenier D; Degner LF
Psychooncology; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1273-82. PubMed ID: 22821445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology.
Hack TF; Whelan T; Olivotto IA; Weir L; Bultz BD; Magwood B; Ashbury F; Brady J
Psychooncology; 2007 Apr; 16(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 16906625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough.
Butow P; Devine R; Boyer M; Pendlebury S; Jackson M; Tattersall MH
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Nov; 22(21):4401-9. PubMed ID: 15514382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician counseling for hypertension: what do doctors really do?
Bell RA; Kravitz RL
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jul; 72(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 18328663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Involving the patient: a prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care.
van den Brink JL; Moorman PW; de Boer MF; Pruyn JF; Verwoerd CD; van Bemmel JH
Int J Med Inform; 2005 Oct; 74(10):839-49. PubMed ID: 16043392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Providing letters and audiotapes to supplement a prenatal diagnostic consultation: effects on later distress and recall.
Cope CD; Lyons AC; Donovan V; Rylance M; Kilby MD
Prenat Diagn; 2003 Dec; 23(13):1060-7. PubMed ID: 14691993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Information and worry among patients with non-oncohematological pathologies upon arrival at the hematology clinic].
RodrÃguez JN; Quesada JA; Sánchez JL; Martino ML; Prados D
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Oct; 44(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 10618914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Family physicians' roles in cancer care. Survey of patients on a provincial cancer registry.
Sisler JJ; Brown JB; Stewart M
Can Fam Physician; 2004 Jun; 50():889-96. PubMed ID: 15233372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating a decision aid for patients with localized prostate cancer in clinical practice.
Isebaert S; Van Audenhove C; Haustermans K; Junius S; Joniau S; De Ridder K; Van Poppel H
Urol Int; 2008; 81(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 19077396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
