316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7838231)
1. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
Manschot WA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics in publication.
Spångberg LS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):797-8. PubMed ID: 20451839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review: the cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity.
Hillard T; Baber R
Climacteric; 2021 Apr; 24(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 33645415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
Youngs R; Kenyon G
J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflections on scientific fraud.
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6906):417. PubMed ID: 12368816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
Biddle C
AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing?
Berger E
Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 16435419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
Fisher RS; Powers LE
Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidelines on good publication practice. Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
Br J Biomed Sci; 2000; 57(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 10892026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Information transfer in dentistry: opportunities and concerns. Trouble right here in River City: can we ignore it?
Levy BM
J Am Coll Dent; 1989; 56(3):28-32. PubMed ID: 2808953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
