198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7838858)
1. Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles.
Owens IP; Thompson DB
Proc Biol Sci; 1994 Nov; 258(1352):93-9. PubMed ID: 7838858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
Kokko H; Johnstone RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mate choice and the operational sex ratio: an experimental test with robotic crabs.
Hayes CL; Callander S; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD; Backwell PR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1455-61. PubMed ID: 27087241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.
Alpern S; Katrantzi I; Ramsey D
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Jun; 94():63-72. PubMed ID: 23541396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.
Jennions MD; Fromhage L
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Sep; 372(1729):. PubMed ID: 28760755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.
Janicke T; Morrow EH
Ecol Lett; 2018 Mar; 21(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 29341415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility.
Ah-King M; Gowaty PA
Ecol Evol; 2016 Jul; 6(14):4607-42. PubMed ID: 27547301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS.
Johnstone RA; Reynolds JD; Deutsch JC
Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1382-1391. PubMed ID: 28565695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution.
Székely T; Weissing FJ; Komdeur J
J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1500-12. PubMed ID: 24848871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates.
Weir LK; Grant JW; Hutchings JA
Am Nat; 2011 Feb; 177(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 21460553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
Kokko H; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
Edward DA; Chapman T
Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 21890230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior.
Gowaty PA; Hubbell SP
Integr Comp Biol; 2005 Nov; 45(5):931-44. PubMed ID: 21676844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
Sandvik M; Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 267(1458):2151-5. PubMed ID: 11413626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mismeasurement of sexual selection.
Klug H; Heuschele J; Jennions MD; Kokko H
J Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):447-62. PubMed ID: 20088870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex roles and mutual mate choice matter during mate sampling.
Myhre LC; de Jong K; Forsgren E; Amundsen T
Am Nat; 2012 Jun; 179(6):741-55. PubMed ID: 22617262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic versus census estimators of the opportunity for sexual selection in the wild.
Dunn SJ; Waits LP; Byers JA
Am Nat; 2012 Apr; 179(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 22437175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
