894 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7839975)
1. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8750512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(4):1527-32. PubMed ID: 7654041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Studies on angiogenesis in the benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms with the use of color and pulsed Doppler sonography and serum CA-125, CA-19.9, CA-72.4 and vascular endothelial growth factor measurements.
Czekierdowski A
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 12898913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A critical analysis of Doppler velocimetry in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian masses.
Marchesini AC; Magrio FA; Berezowski AT; Neto OB; Nogueira AA; Candido dos Reis FJ
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008; 17(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 18240986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: value of a morphologic scoring system.
Topuz S; Saygili H; Akhan S; Yavuz E; Turfanda A; Berkman S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15857033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler.
Carter J; Saltzman A; Hartenbach E; Fowler J; Carson L; Twiggs LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8272293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?
Brown DL; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Doubilet PM; Benson CB; Waitzkin ED; Muto MG
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 8284377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.
Hamper UM; Sheth S; Abbas FM; Rosenshein NB; Aronson D; Kurman RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1225-8. PubMed ID: 8498222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography and CA-125 in suspicious adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Errasti T; Zornoza A; Mínguez JA; Galán MJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Sep; 66(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 10580673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of resistive index for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses.
Majeed H; Ramzan A; Imran F; Mahfooz-ur-Rehman
J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Nov; 61(11):1104-7. PubMed ID: 22125988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
