These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7841265)

  • 1. Increasing response rates of gynaecologists to a survey: a randomised trial of telephone prompts.
    Ward J; Wain G
    Aust J Public Health; 1994 Sep; 18(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 7841265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of telephone prompts when surveying general practitioners: a randomised trial.
    Osborn M; Ward J; Boyle C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S41-3. PubMed ID: 9479799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effectiveness of telephone prompts by medical and nonmedical staff in increasing survey response rates: a randomised trial.
    Gupta L; Ward J; D'Este C
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Feb; 21(1):98-9. PubMed ID: 9141738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
    Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advance telephone calls ahead of reminder questionnaires increase response rate in non-responders compared to questionnaire reminders only: The RECORD phone trial.
    MacLennan G; McDonald A; McPherson G; Treweek S; Avenell A;
    Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():13. PubMed ID: 24401173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telephone follow-up to a mail survey: when to offer an interview compared to a reminder call.
    Ziegenfuss JY; Burmeister KR; Harris A; Holubar SD; Beebe TJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Mar; 12():32. PubMed ID: 22433024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximizing response rates to a survey of dentists: a randomized trial.
    Rikard-Bell G; Ward J
    Aust Dent J; 2000 Mar; 45(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10846272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys.
    Salim Silva M; Smith WT; Bammer G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2002 Feb; 56(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 11812810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW?
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Zeckendorf S; Niciak A; Wain G; Ross J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 29(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15782877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattellari M; Zwar N; Worthington JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22445084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the New South Wales Cancer Council Pap Test Reminder Service.
    Mills AE; Simpson JM; Shelley JM; Turnbull DA
    Aust J Public Health; 1994 Jun; 18(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 7948334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys.
    Harris LE; Weinberger M; Tierney WM
    Med Care; 1997 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 8998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of advance telephone prompting in a survey of general dental practitioners in scotland: a randomised controlled trial.
    Ho-A-Yun J; Crawford F; Newton J; Clarkson J
    Community Dent Health; 2007 Dec; 24(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18246841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effectiveness of letter and telephone reminders for specific health guidance use: A randomized controlled trial for those intending to use health guidance in a large city].
    Murayama H; Shimada S; Takahashi Y
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2023 Jun; 70(6):381-389. PubMed ID: 36908152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears.
    Norquist BM; Goldberg BA; Matsen FA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Jun; 82(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 10859103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate.
    Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey response inducements for registered nurses.
    Hill CA; Fahrney K; Wheeless SC; Carson CP
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 16585808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of reminders and method of questionnaire distribution on patient response to mail-back satisfaction survey.
    Gasquet I; Falissard B; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Nov; 54(11):1174-80. PubMed ID: 11675170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response rates of three modes of survey administration and survey preferences of rheumatoid arthritis patients.
    Garcia I; Portugal C; Chu LH; Kawatkar AA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2014 Mar; 66(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 23982942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.