90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7841394)
21. Contrast-enhanced gradient-echo MR imaging of the head and neck: experimental and clinical assessment.
Mihara F; Gupta KL; Joslyn JN
Radiat Med; 1994; 12(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 7809407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MR imaging of the breast. Imaging and tissue characterization without intravenous contrast.
Santyr GE
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 7489316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.
Nassenstein K; Breuckmann F; Hunold P; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 19308763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hepatic haemangioma: dynamic MRI using gadolinium-DTPA.
Ohtomo K; Itai Y; Yoshikawa K; Kokubo T; Yashiro N; Iio M
Eur J Radiol; 1987 Nov; 7(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 3691543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7 Tesla utilizing a single-loop coil: a feasibility trial.
Umutlu L; Maderwald S; Kraff O; Theysohn JM; Kuemmel S; Hauth EA; Forsting M; Antoch G; Ladd ME; Quick HH; Lauenstein TC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 20599158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [MR mammography in patients at risk].
Kaiser WA; Mittelmeier O
Rofo; 1992 Jun; 156(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 1617179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: radiologic-pathologic correlation].
Kawashima H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 56(7):459-69. PubMed ID: 8692661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Dynamic MR mammography: is the course of signal intensification suitable for the differentiation of different forms of mastopathy?].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Lebeau A; Kohnert M; Untch M; Bohmert H; Reiser M
Rofo; 1996 Jul; 165(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 8765364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.
Gribbestad IS; Nilsen G; Fjøsne HE; Kvinnsland S; Haugen OA; Rinck PA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):477-80. PubMed ID: 8061451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improved visualization of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced magnetization transfer MR imaging.
Schreiber WG; Brix G; Knopp MV; Hess T; Lorenz WJ
Magn Reson Med; 1996 Jun; 35(6):861-9. PubMed ID: 8744014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The nipple in MR mammography--the normal findings and the signs of disease].
Ohmenhäuser K; Müller-Schimpfle M; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 10464500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma.
Murray AD; Redpath TW; Needham G; Gilbert FJ; Brookes JA; Eremin O
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):594-600. PubMed ID: 8696694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The value of MR-mammography at 1.5 tesla in the differential diagnosis of non-puerperal mastitis and inflammatory breast carcinoma].
Tomczak R; Rieber A; Zeitler H; Rilinger N; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ
Rofo; 1996 Aug; 165(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 8924667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing 1.5-Tesla and 3-Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts.
Chatterji M; Mercado CL; Moy L
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):207-24, viii. PubMed ID: 20494307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is there a correlation in breast carcinomas between tumor size and number of tumor vessels detected by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography?
Siewert C; Oellinger H; Sherif HK; Blohmer JU; Hadijuana J; Felix R
MAGMA; 1997 Mar; 5(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 9219176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity.
Rieber A; Zeitler H; Rosenthal H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):452-8. PubMed ID: 9227225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
