These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7841394)

  • 41. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma.
    Rieber A; Merkle E; Zeitler H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9294575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Focal and diffuse lesions in dynamic MR-mammography of healthy probands].
    Kuhl CK; Seibert C; Sommer T; Kreft B; Gieseke J; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1995 Sep; 163(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 7548868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data.
    Agoston AT; Daniel BL; Herfkens RJ; Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Heiss SG; Sawyer-Glover AM
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11158656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A fast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions.
    Perman WH; Heiberg EM; Grunz J; Herrmann VM; Janney CG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 8057758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Boné B; Péntek Z; Perbeck L; Veress B
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Field strength dependence of MRI contrast enhancement: phantom measurements and application to dynamic breast imaging.
    Hittmair K; Turetschek K; Gomiscek G; Stiglbauer R; Schurawitzki H
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):215-20. PubMed ID: 8800864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Ohmenhäuser K; Sand J; Stoll P; Claussen CD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography.
    Hoffmann U; Brix G; Knopp MV; Hess T; Lorenz WJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Apr; 33(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 7776881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions.
    Chenevert TL; Helvie MA; Aisen AM; Francis IR; Adler DD; Roubidoux MA; Londy FJ
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 7784556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times with FLASH for dynamic MRI of the breast.
    Brookes JA; Redpath TW; Gilbert FJ; Needham G; Murray AD
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):206-14. PubMed ID: 8800863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Breast MRI: early experience with a 3-D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence in the evaluation of breast lesions.
    Holden A; Anderson JE; Ives FJ; Taylor D; Wylie EJ; Adamson R
    Australas Radiol; 1996 Nov; 40(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 8996898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
    Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Errors in quantitative dynamic three-dimensional keyhole MR imaging of the breast.
    Plewes DB; Bishop J; Soutar I; Cohen E
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 7633115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. High-quality breast MRI.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):547-62. PubMed ID: 24792656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of partial volume and phase shift between fat and water in gradient-echo magnetic resonance-mammography.
    Peller M; Stehling MK; Sittek H; Kessler M; Reiser M
    MAGMA; 1996 Jun; 4(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 8875396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. MR-guided localization of suspected breast lesions detected exclusively by postcontrast MRI.
    Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Bruhn H; Keating D; Raab BW; Oestmann JW
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 7822550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Bishop JE; Santyr GE; Kelcz F; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(4):716-23. PubMed ID: 9243393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [MR-compatible and conventional marker wires in breast diagnosis--experimental studies on their dislocatability and artifact size in MRT].
    Langen HJ; Walter C; Ernst S; Kugel H; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1999 Mar; 170(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 10230442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. MR imaging and proton spectroscopy of the breast: how to select the images useful to convey the diagnostic message.
    Fausto A; Magaldi A; Babaei Paskeh B; Menicagli L; Lupo EN; Sardanelli F
    Radiol Med; 2007 Oct; 112(7):1060-8. PubMed ID: 17952685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A rapid interleaved method for measuring signal intensity curves in both blood and tissue during contrast agent administration.
    Taylor NJ; Rowland IJ; Tanner SF; Leach MO
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Dec; 30(6):744-9. PubMed ID: 8139457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.