349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7841504)
1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
Zonana H
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
Grivas CR; Komar DA
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
Krauss DA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?
Brakel SJ; Gonzalez ER; Cavanaugh JL
Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry; 1996 Jul; 1(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 10320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
Perry C
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Congressional action to amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702: a mischievous attempt to codify Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Farrell NS
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):523-51. PubMed ID: 9212529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: active judicial scrutiny of scientific evidence.
Kirsch EW
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):213-34. PubMed ID: 10342992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Psychiatric anamnesis, psychiatric findings and their relevance for legal questions in psychiatric assessment before the social court].
Zeit T; Wiester W
Nervenarzt; 1995 Mar; 66(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 7753244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
Berger MA
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry].
Pietzcker A
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):623-6. PubMed ID: 9064935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge.
Buchanan A
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17185474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
Davies J
Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
Faigman DL; Monahan J
Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
