These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7841894)

  • 21. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linear versus non-linear recordings of transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions--methodological considerations.
    Von Specht H; Ganz M; Pethe J; Leuschner S; Pytel J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):116-8. PubMed ID: 11318439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: feasibility in the nursery.
    Salamy A; Eldredge L; Sweetow R
    Ear Hear; 1996 Feb; 17(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A bispectral approach to analyze nonlinear cochlear active mechanisms in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Marchesi S; Tognola G; Paglialonga A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2013 Aug; 7(4):401-13. PubMed ID: 23893200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input-output function variation in a large sample of neonates and implications for hearing screening.
    How J; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):670-9. PubMed ID: 17978949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Clinical use of transitory otoacoustic evoked emissions in therapeutic follow-up].
    Hoth S; Bönnhoff S
    HNO; 1993 Mar; 41(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 7682543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years.
    Ferguson MA; Smith PA; Davis AC; Lutman ME
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 10905398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. "Linear" and "derived" otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study.
    Tognola G; Ravazzani P; Molini E; Ricci G; Alunni N; Parazzini M; Grandori F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 11409854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes.
    Abdala C; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL49-55. PubMed ID: 20649189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction.
    Arslan RB; Ozdamar O; Ulgen Y
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns.
    Lafreniere D; Jung MD; Smurzynski J; Leonard G; Kim DO; Sasek J
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 117(12):1382-9. PubMed ID: 1845266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening.
    Jacobson JT; Jacobson CA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 29(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 8056507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing.
    Thornton AR; Kimm L; Kennedy CR
    Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 182(1-2):65-76. PubMed ID: 12948603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predischarge screening of very low birthweight infants by click evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Gill AW; Gosling D; Kelly C; Walker P; Wooderson S
    J Paediatr Child Health; 1998 Oct; 34(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 9767510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High-frequency transient evoked otoacoustic emissions acquisition with auditory canal compensated clicks using swept-tone analysis.
    Bennett CL; Ozdamar O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2410-9. PubMed ID: 20370024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic classification of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions using an artificial neural network.
    Buller G; Lutman ME
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Aug; 32(4):235-47. PubMed ID: 9923985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.