These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7841895)

  • 1. Reliability and predictive value of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.
    Aubert LR; Clarke GP
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 7841895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of stimulation parameters on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Tavartkiladze GA; Potalova LA; Kruglov AV; Belov A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 11603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Hodges AV; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Balkany TJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 7917192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with absence of cochlear modiolus receiving cochlear implantation].
    Wang ZX; Wang LE; Gong SS; Han SG; Gao FQ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 31(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29871199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Bertschy M; Tyler RS; Lowder M; Takahashi G; Purdy S; Gantz BJ
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):439-49. PubMed ID: 8654899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements.
    Macherey O; Stahl P; Intartaglia B; Meunier S; Roman S; Schön D
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108176. PubMed ID: 33524792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EABRs and surface potentials with a transcutaneous multielectrode cochlear implant.
    Gallégo S; Truy E; Morgon A; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Mar; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 9105440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wei CG; Wang Y; Li H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Kelsay D; Gantz BJ
    Ear Hear; 1994 Apr; 15(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 8020649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
    Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Development of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response modules of REZ-I domestic cochlear implant device].
    Ding X; Zhang R; Xu C; Fan W; Zhang D
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 49(12):1013-6. PubMed ID: 25623869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV; Otto SR
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.