These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The LES locator: accurate placement of an electrode for 24-hour pH measurement with a combined solid state pressure transducer. Singh S; Price JE; Richter JE Am J Gastroenterol; 1992 Aug; 87(8):967-70. PubMed ID: 1642219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A simple method of anorectal manometry. Schouten WR; van Vroonhoven TJ Dis Colon Rectum; 1983 Nov; 26(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 6628145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intraluminal micromanometry: an evaluation of the dynamic performance of micro-extrusions and sleeve sensors. Omari T; Bakewell M; Fraser R; Malbert C; Davidson G; Dent J Neurogastroenterol Motil; 1996 Sep; 8(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 8878084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Anorectal manometry: a new simplified technique. Vela AR; Rosenberg AJ Am J Gastroenterol; 1982 Jul; 77(7):486-90. PubMed ID: 7091139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A circumferentially-sensitive miniature pressure sensor for study of human esophageal motility. Kaye MD; Showalter JP; Rock KC; Johnson E Med Res Eng; 1977 Nov; 12(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 613191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intraluminal esophageal manometry: an analysis of variables affecting recording fidelity of peristaltic pressures. Stef JJ; Dodds WJ; Hogan WJ; Linehan JH; Stewart ET Gastroenterology; 1974 Aug; 67(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 4847702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of Cardiac Cycle Locating to Minimize the Influence of Cardiac Artifacts on Esophageal Pressure Measurement During Dynamic Occlusion Test. He X; Sun XM; Chen GQ; Yang YL; Shi ZH; Xu M; Zhou JX Respir Care; 2018 Feb; 63(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 29066585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Motor responses of the upper esophageal sphincter and body to intraluminal acid. Andreollo NA; Thompson DG; Kendall GP; McIntyre AS; Earlam RJ Braz J Med Biol Res; 1989; 22(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 2758172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High-resolution esophageal manometry: addressing thermal drift of the manoscan system. Robertson EV; Lee YY; Derakhshan MH; Wirz AA; Whiting JR; Seenan JP; Connolly P; McColl KE Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Jan; 24(1):61-4, e11. PubMed ID: 22188326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans. Castell JA; Dalton CB; Castell DO Am J Physiol; 1990 Feb; 258(2 Pt 1):G173-8. PubMed ID: 2305883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The fibre Fabry Perot sensor. A long-term manometry sensor for quantitative intraluminal pressure measurement of the gastrointestinal tract. Schneider J; Modler H; Kist R; Wölfelschneider H; Becker HD Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1990 Nov; 11(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 2279374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new electronic transducer system for gastrointestinal pressure studies. Förster CF; Weihrauch TR; Brummer A; Vallerius P; Lehmann H Med Prog Technol; 1977 Apr; 4(4):169-75. PubMed ID: 865416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. NORMATIVE VALUES FOR A NEW WATER-PERFUSED HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY SYSTEM. Silva RMBD; Herbella FAM; Gualberto D Arq Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 55Suppl 1(Suppl 1):30-34. PubMed ID: 30088532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency responses of infant air-balloon versus liquid-filled catheters for intra-esophageal pressure measurement. Hartford CG; Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM; Rogers GG Pediatr Pulmonol; 1997 Nov; 24(5):353-63. PubMed ID: 9407569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Responses of the upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal body to graded intraluminal distension. Andreollo NA; Thompson DG; Kendall GP; Earlam RJ Braz J Med Biol Res; 1987; 20(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 3690052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of esophageal distention on pressure and electromyographic activity of the pharyngoesophageal sphincter, with identification of the esophagopharyngeal reflex. Shafik A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Dec; 114(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 9434692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of radially sensitive and circumferentially sensitive microtransducer esophageal manometry probes in normal subjects. Rex DK; Hast JL; Lehman GA; Mathis J; Elmore M Am J Gastroenterol; 1988 Feb; 83(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 3341337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Detects Esophageal Contractility Not Observed With Manometry in Patients With Achalasia. Carlson DA; Lin Z; Kahrilas PJ; Sternbach J; Donnan EN; Friesen L; Listernick Z; Mogni B; Pandolfino JE Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1742-51. PubMed ID: 26278501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis in humans: effect of atropine. Paterson WG; Hynna-Liepert TT; Selucky M Am J Physiol; 1991 Jan; 260(1 Pt 1):G52-7. PubMed ID: 1987807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]